Van's Air Force

The definitive Van's Aircraft support community! Buying, building or flying an RV? Join our exclusive family of mentors and enthusiasts!

VPX Issues That No One Can Solve

The switch is separate to the VPX. You wire to say switch 3 input pin in the VPX and then you can choose which items switch 3 turns on by picking switch 3. I changed all my switch 3 (avionics) to “always on” so the switch is not doing anything. One flight down with no issues since the change. If these contacts won’t stay clean because of the low current, it’s does not sound like a safe way to wire an avionics power.
Might have already mentioned this but you could change switches in the VPX programming. SWAP switch 3 with another switch that is wired to the VPX (landing) and then swap caps so you don't get confused. Go in and change all switch 3's to whatever the landing power was on and set landing to switch 3. That would tell you if you might have bad avionics switch or associated wiring or pin that's on switch 3. It's a 5-minute job. If you have not had an issue with "always on" maybe it is a bad switch, wiring or pin?

Also, if that's an ACK-04 ELT appears its mounted upside down. 🙃 Seems to happen a lot. Pressing the button that says on will turn it off.

Screenshot 2025-11-13 134856.png

Good luck, I know can be frustrating.
 
Last edited:
Might have already mentioned this but you could change switches in the VPX programming. SWAP switch 3 with another switch that is wired to the VPX (landing) and then swap caps so you don't get confused. Go in and change all switch 3's to whatever the landing power was on and set landing to switch 3. That would tell you if you might have bad avionics switch or associated wiring or pin that's on switch 3. It's a 5-minute job. If you have not had an issue with "always on" maybe it is a bad switch, wiring or pin?

Also, if that's an ACK-04 ELT appears its mounted upside down. 🙃 Seems to happen a lot. Pressing the button that says on will turn it off.

View attachment 102044

Good luck, I know can be frustrating.
That is a good plan for testing with a different switch and wire.
Good catch on the ELT. That was a VAF test and you won the prize.... Kidding.
Thanks for the help.
 
That is a good plan for testing with a different switch and wire.
Good catch on the ELT. That was a VAF test and you won the prize.... Kidding.
Thanks for the help.
BTW, although gold contacts might be better Stein has supplied thousands of silver or silver tin-oxide contact switches for VPX applications (including 2 of my airframes) and to date have never seen or heard of an issue with silver contacts but when measuring in PPM you could have an outlier. Going to a different switch might tell you something even if it has an unreliable silver contact. 😥
 
Last edited:
BTW, although gold contacts might be better Stein has supplied thousands of silver or silver tin-oxide contact switches for VPX applications (including 2 of my airframes) and to date have never seen or heard of an issue with silver contacts but when measuring in PPM you could have an outlier. Going to a different switch might tell you something even if it has an unreliable silver contact. 😥
this has been my experience as well. clearly gold is better, but very low current draws tend not to harm the silver ones and therefore often provide a good low resistance over a long period of time.

If you think the switch is the problem, just measure the resistance. If below .5 ohms, it is not likely the source of your problems
 
Maybe this has been addressed within the conversation regarding the VPX, switching and error monitoring... Maybe not... The VPX requires a ground provided by the panel switch or a circuit from within an AFS / Dynon panel to enable a circuit. The ground enable is NOT fault monitored (to my knowledge), therefore there would be no failure indication from the VPX if it were an intermittent grounding error.
Failure monitoring is conducted for the attached device once power is enabled to the device (i.e. GTN, AP, etc.). Over current, power, etc. are monitored and indicated from the VPX to the EFIS.
Needless to say, it is frustrating as all get-out when an intermittent ground to the enabling switch occurs, with no fault indication (because the circuitry isn't designed to provide any). I boils down to pure ohming, and though not recommended, shot-gunning replacement wiring from the ground source to the enabling switch(es).
I've been running for 10+ years on a VPX-Pro to a fully redundant IFR (dual GTN-650) system with absolutely no errors. Maybe I'm blessed... but the wiring system is solid.
AS the OP indicates this was not his build (IIRC), there may be gremlins hiding from the original builder's work.
 
Just a tidbit, but in a vpx install, switches used to turn off/on devices are only used to make a ground contact, they don't switch device current
 
Check the current rating before buying new switches. Gold contacts have low resistance. But they can not switch very much current.
 
How do you override it? You have to do the "always on" with a computer first then you can turn it on or off from the G3X. If you don't change the always on you are not bypassing the switch. Is that what you mean?
The VPX page on the G3X will allow you to enable or disable a circuit regardless of the state of any external rocker switch slaved to that circuit. So lets say your AV Master switch craps out, you can just re-enable the circuit from that page.
 
Check the current rating before buying new switches. Gold contacts have low resistance. But they can not switch very much current.
VPX per there instructions switches carry very little actual loads per awg wire specs:

Screenshot 2025-11-13 184423.png
 
So all my switches that tie to the VPX are wrong then. Will a gold switch stay clean over time with the low current? Sounds like I need to change all them now too as they will likely be the next problem.
Wow, I leave for a few days and there are pages more of replies. Great to see the RV community pitching in to help!

The VP-X includes circuitry to address this issue. You can use any switch you want. The VP-X introduces what is called 'wetting current' or 'wiping current' that effectively and gently cleans the switch contacts over time, each time you flip the switch.
 
Are you kidding? So a single source custom computer running your entire electrical system is ok but not a simple ultra reliable avionics switch??
(PS: Logic switches are not the same as load switches, they should have gold contacts.)
I’ve been requested to install VPX for the guy who feels like he needs all the ‘features’,….. my response, time to go elsewhere as I won’t install a panel with VPX.
I'll have to respectfully disagree with Walt on this one. This was hotly debated on VAF 18 years ago when the VP systems first came out, and there will always be people who want the latest and those who are only comfortable with traditional stuff.

My view is that same fault mode applies to an EFIS as well. If your EFIS goes bad you lose primary instruments and cannot fly again. What we've learned, though, is that an EFIS is much more reliable than mechanical gauges, and certainly the VP-X is quantifiably more reliable (I don't have the numbers any more) than old-school switches and breakers. And all solutions, new and old, are subject to failures or mis-installation.
 
I had some bizarre issues with my Advanced Control Module. Very similar to VPX. Boxes would go dark and restart. I found a loose ground on the main connection.
These electronic breaker boxes control stuff with ground. Kinda like a Suzuki Samurai. I own one. If any ground gets loose or dirty, things get really wacky.
Just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
Troy
Your panel looks a lot like the one in my -10
Have you checked or replaced the avionics switch.?
I know that rocker switches can fail or go intermittently

Jim Frisbie
RV 10
Tech C EAA CH 105
 
Troy
Your panel looks a lot like the one in my -10
Have you checked or replaced the avionics switch.?
I know that rocker switches can fail or go intermittently

Jim Frisbie
RV 10
Tech C EAA CH 105
I am currently bypassing it and it is working fine but only one flight in. I will be looking into that switch.
 
I'll have to respectfully disagree with Walt on this one. This was hotly debated on VAF 18 years ago when the VP systems first came out, and there will always be people who want the latest and those who are only comfortable with traditional stuff.

My view is that same fault mode applies to an EFIS as well. If your EFIS goes bad you lose primary instruments and cannot fly again. What we've learned, though, is that an EFIS is much more reliable than mechanical gauges, and certainly the VP-X is quantifiably more reliable (I don't have the numbers any more) than old-school switches and breakers. And all solutions, new and old, are subject to failures or mis-installation.

I couldn't disagree more. These things are not in the same category. The EFIS is competing with a vacuum system that is prone to fail due to leaks and pump failure and doesn't give much information, compared to gobs of information with an EFIS. So, accepting a new failure mode makes sense to get away from the vacuum system and much more information, while the the VPX is competing with fuses and breakers which almost never fail and the information it gives is not ultimately useful.

I care about TFRs, traffic, runways, etc that the EFIS gives me, I don't really care that my lights are using 1.1 amps unless they are shorted.

My airplane has breakers for things I might want to reset in flight and fuses for everything else. Decisions are already made. If the breaker opens, perhaps it makes sense to troubleshoot, if a fuse blows, land when able.

Sometimes less is more, and more information complicates things.
 
I couldn't disagree more. These things are not in the same category. The EFIS is competing with a vacuum system that is prone to fail due to leaks and pump failure and doesn't give much information, compared to gobs of information with an EFIS. So, accepting a new failure mode makes sense to get away from the vacuum system and much more information, while the the VPX is competing with fuses and breakers which almost never fail and the information it gives is not ultimately useful.

I care about TFRs, traffic, runways, etc that the EFIS gives me, I don't really care that my lights are using 1.1 amps unless they are shorted.

My airplane has breakers for things I might want to reset in flight and fuses for everything else. Decisions are already made. If the breaker opens, perhaps it makes sense to troubleshoot, if a fuse blows, land when able.

Sometimes less is more, and more information complicates things.
Some of us like more data, some don't. Some prefer steam gauges, some not. It's your choice..........Personally, I like systems that can tell me amp draw per circuit. You may not. Easier to troubleshoot an issue, just not for you to try and understand "complicating things" it seems.
 
I couldn't disagree more. These things are not in the same category. The EFIS is competing with a vacuum system that is prone to fail due to leaks and pump failure and doesn't give much information, compared to gobs of information with an EFIS. So, accepting a new failure mode makes sense to get away from the vacuum system and much more information, while the the VPX is competing with fuses and breakers which almost never fail and the information it gives is not ultimately useful.

I care about TFRs, traffic, runways, etc that the EFIS gives me, I don't really care that my lights are using 1.1 amps unless they are shorted.

My airplane has breakers for things I might want to reset in flight and fuses for everything else. Decisions are already made. If the breaker opens, perhaps it makes sense to troubleshoot, if a fuse blows, land when able.

Sometimes less is more, and more information complicates things.
The really great thing about building your own plane is you can build it anyway you want!
 
Some of us like more data, some don't. Some prefer steam gauges, some not. It's your choice..........Personally, I like systems that can tell me amp draw per circuit. You may not. Easier to troubleshoot an issue, just not for you to try and understand "complicating things" it seems.
Its risk vs reward in all of these decisions and you are correct that we will all weigh each side of the scale differently. What if i offered you fly by wire. We ditch the throttle cable and replace with sensor and servo motor, so now you can see down to a tenth of an inch how far in your throttle is. Are you interested? Will you take the risk of a failed sensor preventing you from going to idle as you land? What about electronically activated brakes where you can display exactly how far the pedal is depressed instead of the old outdated hydraulic system that provides no data. Will you accept the risk that a blown capacitor on the board prevents you from stopping at the end of the runway? Advanced computer controls is cool and offers more data, but cones at a non zero reliability hit. Simple mechanical systems generally offer greater reliability at the cost of more limited capabilities. I really struggle to see how an advanced computerized power distribution unit is just as reliable as a circuit breaker and a switch. Thats like saying a typewriter is just as likely to reboot itself as a computer.

I was flying along one day at 10000’ and my g3x just rebooted. No rhyme or reason, just having a bad day. No flight data for a minute. What if that was my power bus controller that took out my ignition system and my engine died?
 
Last edited:
A bit late to the discussion but switch and relay wetting current is definitely a thing. Good quality hermetically sealed switches (Honeywell TL milspec series for example) are generally ok to use with logic level signals (not recommended by the vendor though) but I sure wouldn’t use an unsealed silver contact switch in a low current application. It’ll work for a while and then become intermittent. You can get the milspec switches with gold contacts but they are expensive and harder to find in stock at the usual vendors. Octopart is your friend to find parts like that.

For switched ground circuits, you can sometimes add a pull-up power resistor to increase the wetting current at the expense of wasted power.

-Bob
 
Some of us like more data, some don't. Some prefer steam gauges, some not. It's your choice..........Personally, I like systems that can tell me amp draw per circuit. You may not. Easier to troubleshoot an issue, just not for you to try and understand "complicating things" it seems.
I do like more information, but from a risk analysis perspective the information it gives me isn’t worth the new failure modes.

Knowing the current of a circuit won’t prevent me from busting airspace, but an EFIS absolutely will.

I try not to have too much thread drift, so thinking about the cost:benefit might be applicable, but probably not worth posting more as the OP has already experienced the cons of adding complexity, and is undoubtably considering that in light of the pros….
 
If you have a Plane Power alternator replace it. I guarantee that is the problem. And when I say replace it, I mean with a B&C.

We have replaced dozens down here with ALL THE SAME SYMPTOMS.

High amounts of ripple from a faulty built in rectifier/regulator. Notchy supply in voltage swings results in similar current swings.
Interesting. How did you determine that the alternator was producing ripple/voltage swings? Was this visible in the EFIS graphs, or did it require an oscilloscope? Here's 2 mins of data from my EFIS showing current and voltage - I think it looks strange, but has not caused any operational issues....

1763109253751.png

(Troy confirmed he has a B&C alternator, so this discussion is probably mute. Apologies.)
 
Last edited:
Troy,
I had one of those same switches fail intermittently. The contacts were full of corrosion. I replaced them all suspecting a bad batch. Consider this. Could an intermittent issue with any one of the switches, or wiring issue could trigger a software glitch. In addition, is it possible for a bad signal on the RS232 line to cause an intermittent power off. When the power fails, does the VPX page show the pin in an off or on position, does the vpx still indicate that power exists to the failed LRU?
Are both radios that are being switched off connected to the same VPX internal buss? As Marc stated, the VPX has two internal independent busses.
Do you have the optional VPX low current fault detection turned off for all the electronics boxes?
 
Troy,
I had one of those same switches fail intermittently. The contacts were full of corrosion. I replaced them all suspecting a bad batch. Consider this. Could an intermittent issue with any one of the switches, or wiring issue could trigger a software glitch. In addition, is it possible for a bad signal on the RS232 line to cause an intermittent power off. When the power fails, does the VPX page show the pin in an off or on position, does the vpx still indicate that power exists to the failed LRU?
Are both radios that are being switched off connected to the same VPX internal buss? As Marc stated, the VPX has two internal independent busses.
Do you have the optional VPX low current fault detection turned off for all the electronics boxes?
The Vpx shows the power going off. I am using a different internal buss for each unit. Well using all 3. The fault is turned off. When it does the multiple cycles if I shut it off on the Vpx it comes back on on its own.
 
Its risk vs reward in all of these decisions and you are correct that we will all weigh each side of the scale differently. What if i offered you fly by wire. We ditch the throttle cable and replace with sensor and servo motor, so now you can see down to a tenth of an inch how far in your throttle is. Are you interested?

I was flying along one day at 10000’ and my g3x just rebooted. No rhyme or reason, just having a bad day. No flight data for a minute. What if that was my power bus controller that took out my ignition system and my engine died?
If there was thousands of these fly by wire systems out there and 10+ years experience it’s possible but it’s about understanding the risk vs reward as many have said. I’d say to be number one with said system no not worth it. But let’s not be creating a DARPA project and use that as rational it’s to complicated.

You bring up a good example and that’s exactly why I (as probably the vast majority of EFI system user with VPX) did and bypass their VPX system in favor of traditional CB’s for their fuel and ignition system.

Some of us think rocker switches have no place in an airplane let alone toggle switches with silver contacts and that’s ok. Again it’s about understanding and medicating risk and if toggle switches exceed that threshold do not use, doesn’t bother me at all.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. How did you determine that the alternator was producing ripple/voltage swings? Was this visible in the EFIS graphs, or did it require an oscilloscope? Here's 2 mins of data from my EFIS showing current and voltage - I think it looks strange, but has not caused any operational issues....

View attachment 102098
I see a similar pattern (drifts only oscillate < .4 volts though) on my GRT voltage sense input; There is a bunch of noise or something in there system and admit this is a byproduct; Something about the video driver power supply. The EIS and the G3X in my other plane are very stable. That said, your graph would scare the crap out of me! Suggest getting readings via a trusted meter. If you are actually seeing voltage swings of 6 volts, I promise you it won't be symptom free for much longer.
 
Its risk vs reward in all of these decisions and you are correct that we will all weigh each side of the scale differently. What if i offered you fly by wire. We ditch the throttle cable and replace with sensor and servo motor, so now you can see down to a tenth of an inch how far in your throttle is. Are you interested? Will you take the risk of a failed sensor preventing you from going to idle as you land? What about electronically activated brakes where you can display exactly how far the pedal is depressed instead of the old outdated hydraulic system that provides no data. Will you accept the risk that a blown capacitor on the board prevents you from stopping at the end of the runway? Advanced computer controls is cool and offers more data, but cones at a non zero reliability hit. Simple mechanical systems generally offer greater reliability at the cost of more limited capabilities. I really struggle to see how an advanced computerized power distribution unit is just as reliable as a circuit breaker and a switch. Thats like saying a typewriter is just as likely to reboot itself as a computer.

I was flying along one day at 10000’ and my g3x just rebooted. No rhyme or reason, just having a bad day. No flight data for a minute. What if that was my power bus controller that took out my ignition system and my engine died?
Yet anyone who drives a newer vehicle has exactly what you describe with electronic throttle control and brakes and steering…and they are driving far more often than flying. Are you willing to accept a fault in any one of those systems while you are going 70 in the highway in traffic?
 
I do like more information, but from a risk analysis perspective the information it gives me isn’t worth the new failure modes.

Knowing the current of a circuit won’t prevent me from busting airspace, but an EFIS absolutely will.

I try not to have too much thread drift, so thinking about the cost:benefit might be applicable, but probably not worth posting more as the OP has already experienced the cons of adding complexity, and is undoubtably considering that in light of the pros….
How do you explain the majority of VPX users that have experienced zero issues? Yet the OP has had TWO failures. If it was a systemic problem, statistically you would have others having the same problem across the field of users.
 
How do you explain the majority of VPX users that have experienced zero issues? Yet the OP has had TWO failures. If it was a systemic problem, statistically you would have others having the same problem across the field of users.
Agreed. I say let's stay on topic and help the op solve his problem ... no minds are being changed here ... there is a level of risk we all accept.
 
If you have a Plane Power alternator replace it. I guarantee that is the problem. And when I say replace it, I mean with a B&C.

We have replaced dozens down here with ALL THE SAME SYMPTOMS.

High amounts of ripple from a faulty built in rectifier/regulator. Notchy supply in voltage swings results in similar current swings. The VPX thinks this is a short circuit, even reports it as such.

I would be extremely surprised if the fault is anything else. Now if you have a B&C then you do have a tricky thing to fault find as they rarely if ever give trouble.
I had very similar symptoms with my VPX. Audio panel and Autopilot each rebooting randomly, but only very occasionally.
Changed out my Plane Power alternator and it stopped happening.
 
#RV10inOz / [email protected]

Below statement in OPs #1 post

"I understand that some had issues with the VPX because of and plane power alternator. It was creating faults. Not sure I got that right. I have a new B and C so I assume that should be fine. "
 
Last edited:
How do you explain the majority of VPX users that have experienced zero issues? Yet the OP has had TWO failures. If it was a systemic problem, statistically you would have others having the same problem across the field of users.
It might be more of an issue than we know. I just was in contact with yet another person last night that had the same issue as me but more severe with the cycling. Not everyone posts on VAF and when you talk to VPX it’s the first they heard about it when you have a problem. He solved his with a new master relay. Then many flight hours later it happened again and a new relay fixed it. I am planning a more permanent fix. Clearly the system is sensitive on some installs.
 
It might be more of an issue than we know. I just was in contact with yet another person last night that had the same issue as me but more severe with the cycling. Not everyone posts on VAF and when you talk to VPX it’s the first they heard about it when you have a problem. He solved his with a new master relay. Then many flight hours later it happened again and a new relay fixed it. I am planning a more permanent fix. Clearly the system is sensitive on some installs.
Or less than you think. But definitely not "clearly the system is sensitive on some installs", there's no data to support this claim or even if the op and "another person" are having the same issue or that either issue is VPX related.

Claims like this fall under "I heard it on the internet so it must be true", we're smarter than that.
 
Yet anyone who drives a newer vehicle has exactly what you describe with electronic throttle control and brakes and steering…and they are driving far more often than flying. Are you willing to accept a fault in any one of those systems while you are going 70 in the highway in traffic?
Yes, I accept that fault. And yes, I have troubleshoot and replaced pedal sensors that failed as well as electronically actuated throttle bodies that caused erratic performance. Consider all of Toyotas problems / lawsuits related to uncommanded throttle application (unclear whether the computer went haywire or the driver). The most serious offender is the crankshaft position sensor; A single $40 variable reluctor, prone to heat failure, that the engine is 100% dependant upon. Seen it abruptly stop the engine in all manners of unsafe conditions.

I do not not view losing my engine at 70 MPH as a life threatening event. Losing engine control on initial climb at 100' AGL is a whole different matter IMO.

Not aware of any electronic braking systems other than trailers. All are hydraulic, with electronic application assist, as in ABS or electronic boosters. Steering the same; No one has gotten rid of the steering shaft yet.
 
Last edited:
What I have learned from all this discussion ( I truly appreciate all of it) there seems to be 3 items that have caused similar failures.

1-Switches
2-Plane Power Alt
3-After the call I got last night, master relays.

The switch is what I believe is my issue. I will continue to fly with it bypassed and see how it works. (Switching to breakers for the avionics just because that make me feel better after I get more time as is ) I will fly it as it is for a while to get a more solid find.
I have a B and C so that is out.
I installed a Blue sea master relay. It was much more expensive. I would think it is better. Is it???
 
I see a similar pattern (drifts only oscillate < .4 volts though) on my GRT voltage sense input; There is a bunch of noise or something in there system and admit this is a byproduct; Something about the video driver power supply. The EIS and the G3X in my other plane are very stable. That said, your graph would scare the crap out of me! Suggest getting readings via a trusted meter. If you are actually seeing voltage swings of 6 volts, I promise you it won't be symptom free for much longer.
Hi Larry, voltage is on the right scale - swings are only about 0.2 volts. The big jumps are current through the hall effect sensor, which is on the B-lead just after the alternator.

(Troy confirmed he has a B&C alternator, so this discussion is probably mute. Apologies.)
 
Hi Larry, voltage is on the right scale - swings are only about 0.2 volts. The big jumps are current through the hall effect sensor, which is on the B-lead just after the alternator.

(Troy confirmed he has a B&C alternator, so this discussion is probably mute. Apologies.)
.2 is nothing and likely just imprecision in the EMS. I would throw a meter on it to confirm though. While .2 is not a big deal, if it is happening, it is abnormal and could be a sign of something not right. Alternators are generally pretty stable outside of periods of changing demand. The PP has a bunch of issues with the stator that can cause symptoms like this and this could be an early warning sign.
 
The PP has a bunch of issues with the stator that can cause symptoms like this and this could be an early warning sign.
Uhm...the stator? The "WYE" windings in the lam-stack that don't move? Please expand upon this...
 
I have had some issues with toggle switches. A few months ago I was experiencing some autopilot abnormal disconnects. I replaced the switch for the autopilot and I haven't had any issues since. The toggle switches I purchased from Stein are rated for 125V and a lot of amps. An electrical engineer friend of mine suggested that the logic level signals that are switched on/off in the VPX-Pro do not have enough current to keep the switch contacts clean and they can become intermittent. I also have replace toggle switches for some of my lights over the past couple years.
Update: Recently I've had issues with my landing light. I replaced the switch, and it worked for a while. Today it was flakey again. When I checked the ground at the switch it was 25 k-ohms. At the other end of the wire is a spade terminal to a ground block. I removed the wire and plugged it into another spade and the resistance to ground at the switch went down to 0.0 ohms. I checked the grounds on all the other switches, and they were all 0.0-0.2 ohms. When I had problems with the autopilot a couple months ago, I replaced the switch and that appears to have solved the problem, but I can't be 100% sure if it was the switch or ground. If I have problems in the future, I'll look at the ground connections before I do anything else. Intermittent problems sure are frustrating. Since I can bi-pass the mechanical switches by using the soft switches in the MFD I'm not too worried.
 
It might be more of an issue than we know. I just was in contact with yet another person last night that had the same issue as me but more severe with the cycling. Not everyone posts on VAF and when you talk to VPX it’s the first they heard about it when you have a problem. He solved his with a new master relay. Then many flight hours later it happened again and a new relay fixed it. I am planning a more permanent fix. Clearly the system is sensitive on some installs.
That could be true; I'm interested in what the difference is that is causing the problem.
 
Have you checked your main battery ground and all the power wires from the battery through the contactor to the VPX for tightness and the crimps? I had an issue with a ring terminal being loose on my backup battery causing my G3X to lockup. The backup battery was connected to the backup power pin on the G3X. Its amazing what dirty power will do to computers.
If you have a portable o-scope you could monitor the power next time you fly and see if you are getting any glitches or dirty power. I would think it to be very rare, but the contactor could be behaving badly possibly.

Just as a data point I have 1700 hours on my VPX with no issues thus-far..... I did a board upgrade this January which added additional current to drive the new flap actuators. So I am running whatever was being produced in Jan. 2025 with no issues
 
Have you checked your main battery ground and all the power wires from the battery through the contactor to the VPX for tightness and the crimps? I had an issue with a ring terminal being loose on my backup battery causing my G3X to lockup. The backup battery was connected to the backup power pin on the G3X. Its amazing what dirty power will do to computers.
If you have a portable o-scope you could monitor the power next time you fly and see if you are getting any glitches or dirty power. I would think it to be very rare, but the contactor could be behaving badly possibly.

Just as a data point I have 1700 hours on my VPX with no issues thus-far..... I did a board upgrade this January which added additional current to drive the new flap actuators. So I am running whatever was being produced in Jan. 2025 with no issues
I did go through them in the spring. I think that was after you had told me then to check them to rule that out. I will look again though.
 
At this point I think it's a near certainty that the issue was a faulty switch, and that replacing the switches with something that is more reliable with lower current and voltage levels will address the issue (such as gold plated contacts).

Also, someone on this thread asked how I can explain the majority of VPX users not having any issues, another pointed out that experimental means build it anyway you want, and a third suggested that there was no data that points to the system being sensitive to installs and concluded that this wasn't the place for any risk analysis.

I respectfully disagree:

1. Airplanes aren't the place for "most people aren't having problems". If only a few people had cracks in their crankshafts, we would want to know about it, not ignore it on the basis that most people haven't had issues.

2. Yes, you can build your airplane any way you want, but I think people should understand the modes of failure to make informed decisions, and if there was a failure that caused a crash, that affects us all. If nothing else, insurance rates....

3. If there isn't data pointing to the system being sensitive to installs, then why is it common knowledge that it doesn't tend to play nice with plane power alternators? Also, this isn't the first we've heard of noise issues with someone else having their VPX shutdown due to a noisy usb power brick. Something that runs on a microcontroller is going to be more sensitive than a fuse and a switch, because: physics.

Least this be viewed as off topic, let me point out that I learned something from this thread and my mind was changed.... I have a BandC PMR1D regulator for my secondary electrical system and apparently the on signal is only 60ma going through a switch. This means my secondary electrical system could end up failing if the switch gets dirty, so I'm going to order a gold plated switch to replace the one I have.

Is this needed? Probably not, but the last time I had an alternator failure I had to hand prop my airplane was here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/7Vxo7nQfvAKWdJtD9
 
Last edited:
Back
Top