I expect this will be my first year flying to Airventure and want to begin working on flying 90 knots.
What power settings work for you in your 10?
And is this for indicated airspeed?
Thank you, I'll take my answer off the air.
I expect this will be my first year flying to Airventure and want to begin working on flying 90 knots.
What power settings work for you in your 10?
And is this for indicated airspeed?
Thank you, I'll take my answer off the air.
True, nothing says you can’t, but per the NOTAM the high arrival @ 135 KTS is for aircraft that can’t comfortably fly at 90 which is definitely not the case for an RV-10.I know I might get some reply's that are negative to the response. But I fly the high arrival at 135 knots. Or I believe is 155 mph.
There is nothing that states you can not fly the higher altitude
It keeps you away from J-3’s and other aircraft that can not go that fast. Plus your at the higher altitude and you generally get the 9-27 runway.
In my 12 years if going to Oshkosh never had an issue with any controllers. Works for me!
Actually, you want to begin flying at 75-80 knots. Cannot tell you how many times I got stuck flying 80 knots with numerous drops to 75 or less. One year it was 75 knots all the way from portage behind a cub. Actually, it was always moving 70-80 because the cub couldn't hold an altitude and slowed on every climb. The radio was a constant stream of "90 knots man!'. I always go up and fly for 30 minutes at these speeds, including turns, each year as it is not something we get a lot of practicing doing. Some day I hope to go to OSH and fly 90 kts the whole way through the line, but hasn't happened yet. Maybe just bad luck for me.I expect this will be my first year flying to Airventure and want to begin working on flying 90 knots.
What power settings work for you in your 10?
And is this for indicated airspeed?
Thank you, I'll take my answer off the air.
I expect this will be my first year flying to Airventure and want to begin working on flying 90 knots.
I know I might get some reply's that are negative to the response. But I fly the high arrival at 135 knots.
Your post mentions monitoring ADSB more than twice.It's worth mentioning -- it's really nice to have at least one other pilot in the cockpit with you when you do this, especially for your first time.
- From my perspective, the most dangerous part is merging in to the end of the line. It's nice to have two or even three sets of eyes for this. One person flying, one person watching ADS-B traffic, and one looking outside.
- Flying in the line isn't particularly hard depending on what other people do. Again, great to have at least two sets of eyes to keep an eye on ADS-B plus visually.
- There are four terminal procedures for the four runways, but by the time you are in line you'll know which two are in use. It's a good idea to print each of these out and have a second person in the plane who can handle these. Discard the two that aren't being used while in line, and then when you get assigned the runway they can reference the correct procedure for you. Depending on the runway, you may need to make some fairly quick actions after you are assigned a runway and that's not a good time to be reading the procedures.
All good advice above, but I would add to practice right traffic pattern turns to final as that is what you will get for 27. Not something I get much around here.Your post mentions monitoring ADSB more than twice.
GMAB! Can you name a more congested airspace with less aircraft that are likely to not have ADSB? IT'S THE EAA... you know, planes without electrical systems flock there.
Everyone in the plane should have eyes outside. Play video games when you get home.
Every year, like clockwork…
I start getting uncomfortable when my oil temp climbs above 225. Extended flight at 90 knots is exactly what happens on a hot summer day. I sure don’t want to chug along for 30 miles at 90 knots. I’ve never done the Congo line, don’t want to, but if I did, I’d be flying the high arrival. The rules still apply that the pilot in command is is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft.True, nothing says you can’t, but per the NOTAM the high arrival @ 135 KTS is for aircraft that can’t comfortably fly at 90 which is definitely not the case for an RV-10.
For the OP, try 16” and one notch of flaps and see what that gets you. Practice maintaining 1000 AGL and a ground track at 90 KTS. Then find an uncontrolled airport that’s not busy and practice the Osh pattern which is a very tight close in pattern descending from the downwind to a spot landing, ideally at or near the weight you think you’ll be coming to Osh at. But the bottom line is there’s no panacea here- you’ve got to get up and dial all of this in for yourself in the air.
If your oil temps are headed that way, it might be time to take a look at your cooling setup. Neither my -6 or my -10 have a problem flying a lengthy arrival at 90 knots. Yours shouldn't have a problem either.I start getting uncomfortable when my oil temp climbs above 225. Extended flight at 90 knots is exactly what happens on a hot summer day. I sure don’t want to chug along for 30 miles at 90 knots. I’ve never done the Congo line, don’t want to, but if I did, I’d be flying the high arrival. The rules still apply that the pilot in command is is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft.
While I am perfectly fine with 90 knots, I would rather fly 135...If your oil temps are headed that way, it might be time to take a look at your cooling setup. Neither my -6 or my -10 have a problem flying a lengthy arrival at 90 knots. Yours shouldn't have a problem either.
Interesting that you comment on that. Based on your comment I am pretty sure you are not flying your 6 with an angle valve engine. Parallel valve engines don’t have this problem as these cylinders are not oil cooled. I’ve built two RV7’s both with angle valve engines and 13 row coolers. I’ve also assisted in the firewall forward install of a 14 with the thunderbolt 390 which is angle valve, and did the phase one flight testing on these aircraft and all three run 185 at normal cruise speeds. Slow down and all three at slow extended periods see temps climb north of 225.If your oil temps are headed that way, it might be time to take a look at your cooling setup. Neither my -6 or my -10 have a problem flying a lengthy arrival at 90 knots. Yours shouldn't have a problem either.
Do those aircraft have cylinder wraps? How about fairings smoothing the exit airflow? Maybe cowl flaps? A cooling plenum? All of those things can help.Interesting that you comment on that. Based on your comment I am pretty sure you are not flying your 6 with an angle valve engine. Parallel valve engines don’t have this problem as these cylinders are not oil cooled. I’ve built two RV7’s both with angle valve engines and 13 row coolers. I’ve also assisted in the firewall forward install of a 14 with the thunderbolt 390 which is angle valve, and did the phase one flight testing on these aircraft and all three run 185 at normal cruise speeds. Slow down and all three at slow extended periods see temps climb north of 225.
If only we could get the eaa to say that in the airventure brochure! Would be so much easier.My best advice to you is to learn how to fly your airplane, before going to KOSH.
I’ve been watching a ton of Airventure/Fisk arrivals on YouTube lately (too soon??? Nah….) and I’m amazed at the number of pilots I see fiddling with all the gizmos they have in their panels and seemingly putting eyes out as a secondary resource. Granted, Adsb is great for maintaining spacing, provided EVERONE in the conga line has in and out and EVERYONE can maintain 90kts. But we all know neither is the case.
This was real easy for me. I was on otto During the arrival. Alt hold was set to altitude in notam. Power was set to keep 1 mile in trail. Heading knob was turned to fly recommended track. Otto on g3x made it really easy.I’ve been watching a ton of Airventure/Fisk arrivals on YouTube lately (too soon??? Nah….) and I’m amazed at the number of pilots I see fiddling with all the gizmos they have in their panels and seemingly putting eyes out as a secondary resource. Granted, Adsb is great for maintaining spacing, provided EVERONE in the conga line has in and out and EVERYONE can maintain 90kts. But we all know neither is the case.
What Kyle said. At 90KTS you are at a very reduced power setting not like a Vx climb at full power. I can fly around all day at 90 KTS in my 10 at 1000AGL here in Florida in July and never have oil temps anywhere near 225*.I start getting uncomfortable when my oil temp climbs above 225. Extended flight at 90 knots is exactly what happens on a hot summer day. I sure don’t want to chug along for 30 miles at 90 knots. I’ve never done the Congo line, don’t want to, but if I did, I’d be flying the high arrival. The rules still apply that the pilot in command is is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft.
I agree, I can fly all day long in my friend’s RV10 at 1000 feet and 90 knots. But I don’t own an RV 10. I own an RV7 with an angle valve engine. Report back after you’ve flown a 7 or 14 with angle valve engine for 30 miles at 90 knots at 1000 feet and tell me what your oil temps areWhat Kyle said. At 90KTS you are at a very reduced power setting not like a Vx climb at full power. I can fly around all day at 90 KTS in my 10 at 1000AGL here in Florida in July and never have oil temps anywhere near 225*.
Ok chief. The OP flies an RV-10 so the discussion, if you didn’t pick up on it, was centered on that model as was the advice. I make no assertions as to the other models because A. I have no knowledge on them and B. I don’t care.I agree, I can fly all day long in my friend’s RV10 at 1000 feet and 90 knots. But I don’t own an RV 10. I own an RV7 with an angle valve engine. Report back after you’ve flown a 7 or 14 with angle valve engine for 30 miles at 90 knots at 1000 feet and tell me when your oil temps are![]()
Your post mentions monitoring ADSB more than twice.
GMAB! Can you name a more congested airspace with less aircraft that are likely to not have ADSB? IT'S THE EAA... you know, planes without electrical systems flock there.
Everyone in the plane should have eyes outside. Play video games when you get home.
I fully agree with this. Couple years ago there were about 10+ planes (flight of 3 or 4 in addition to individuals) all trying to join the line around portage at the same time/place. The screen was invaluable in anticipating and finding a slot. Yes, I looked out the window and yes, I know that there are planes not reported on adsb. It is a tool and in this case, a valuable one, as I never would have been able to visually capture and track that many moving targets. I had my son with me (PPL student at the time) and we shared the load. I used the screen to manage things and he looked out the window, 360*, trying to capture any traffic within a mile of our position and call them out.It's a good point. For my last trip we had three pilots in the plane, and I definitely think it was worthwhile to have one watching ADS-B when trying to merge into the end of the line. There are aircraft coming from all directions and you can adjust your speed/approach to try to arrive with sufficient separation. The other two pilots (in the front seat) had eyes outside. I can't recall how much ADS-B was useful once in line, though.
I concur with your assessment that1500 is a bit tight. What the Fisk controllers will tell you is fly the downwind inside the gravel pit to the North of the airport and off the dep end of 27. You’ll start your decent at about midfield and turn base basically abeam the numbers so it’s gonna look very low and tight to hit the orange dot. Pay close attention to airspeed (don’t get too slow) and don’t be afraid to go around—they’ll simply sequence you back into the downward.Ok so i went and did some flying.
Right pattern work I think I was too close in , maybe 1500 ft off for downwind. What I measure on google says 3000 is normal for 09/27.
I’m not that worried about 36.
18 the base seems mighty tight. I measured things for my airport and am flying that some, landed ok yesterday.
90 kts more concerning, not using Otto for it yet. Power settings oh so low.
I like the higher altitude idea, hope more weigh in on this.
When do you descend from 2300?
Here is a fundamentally important key to be thinking about on the approach for 27 at OSH. At your normal everyday run of the mill approach at any airport you land at, your downwind to base turn will occur approximately 1 mile beyond the end of the runway. At OSH that downwind to base turn will be at the END OF 27! That is what throws many people off their game. Don’t let that throw you! Why? Because that ORANGE dot on 27 is WAYYY down the runway from the end of the runway. RVs (including RV10s) are easily able to make that downwind/to base/to final approach and land on the orange dot. In fact one year our group of around 5 RVs were asked to put it down on the numbers and make the first turn off before the orange dot to expedite our landings to clear an inbound War Bird Island arrival coming in behind us from the East over Lake Winnebago. All 5 of us successfully did so with ease.I concur with your assessment that1500 is a bit tight. What the Fisk controllers will tell you is fly the downwind inside the gravel pit to the North of the airport and off the dep end of 27. You’ll the start your decent at about midfield and turn base basically abeam the numbers so it’s gonna look very low and tight to hit the orange dot. Pay close attention to airspeed (don’t get too slow) and don’t be afraid to go around—they’ll simply sequence you back into the downward.
I beg you not to go the high route— there’s simply no reason to do it . The 10 flys just fine at 90, especially if you add a notch of flaps to lower the nose.
Here is a fundamentally important key to be thinking about on the approach for 27 at OSH. At your normal everyday run of the mill approach at any airport you land at, your downwind to base turn will occur approximately 1 mile beyond the end of the runway. At OSH that downwind to base turn will be at the END OF 27! That is what throws many people off their game. Don’t let that throw you! Why? Because that ORANGE dot on 27 is WAYYY down the runway from the end of the runway. RVs (including RV10s) are easily able to make that downwind/to base/to final approach and land on the orange dot. In fact one year our group of around 5 RVs were asked to put it down on the numbers and make the first turn off before the orange dot to expedite our landings to clear an inbound War Bird Island arrival coming in behind us from the East over Lake Winnebago. All 5 of us successfully did so with ease.
It can be done. It has been done, for many many years, by many many pilots. Those of us who have done it for many many times are the same kind of pilot as you. You can do it! Keep practicing!
18 seems tightest to me. But for 27 base turns over the water are usually happening because the controllers need to extend traffic downwind for spacing, or (more typically) because someone doesn’t follow the rule of beginning their descent while on downwind.This confuses me. When I watch videos of approaches the base turn is happening a lot closer to the water.
I am under the impression that the tight turn downwind to final is 18.
This is the way.You’ll the start your decent at about midfield and turn base basically abeam the numbers
This will make it clearer:This confuses me. When I watch videos of approaches the base turn is happening a lot closer to the water.
I am under the impression that the tight turn downwind to final is 18.

This will make it clearer:View attachment 82787
Again watch your speed on that base to final turn. I watched a plane stall and pancake in on that turn one year. Only minor injuries IIRC but it could have been worse.
The shoreline is the limit. The controllers will often tell you to bing it to the numbers especially if they want you to land on the green dot. Be prepared. And as you will have started your decent at midfield you will be much lower on base and final so it will look very abnormal. It’s very much akin to an IAP circling approach.It makes it clearer that I think I understand it the same. Turn base prior to shoreline. See attached for me 3000 ft. It does not say to turn base at the runway like it does for blue dot runway.
The controllers will call your base. They will turn you when they need you to turn. Having said that, they do not want the line extending out to the lake so they want tight turns when possible. As was mentioned, if things get bottlenecked on the downwind they will extend some planes further out on downwind but that only adds to the congestion later on.It makes it clearer that I think I understand it the same. Turn base prior to shoreline. See attached for me 3000 ft. It does not say to turn base at the runway like it does for blue dot runway.
Load your plane up to the payload you’ll be carrying in and figure those settings out for yourself. That’s the only way to properly figure it out. Check your stall speeds out too, loaded down. Practice spot landing too. Also, watch videos on the arrivals to familiarize with it. It’s chaotic to say the least. Good luck. It’s one heck of an adventure. Not sure about the 10,I expect this will be my first year flying to Airventure and want to begin working on flying 90 knots.
What power settings work for you in your 10?
And is this for indicated airspeed?
Thank you, I'll take my answer off the air.
Sadly, my daughter and I, along with a few friends, watched a Lanceair Legacy overshoot the centerline, then overbank and stall/spin onto the dirt at the end of 27. No survivors. Again, not an arrival we are generally used to getting. Practice to get confident and proficient. A go-around is always an option.This will make it clearer:View attachment 82787
Again watch your speed on that base to final turn. I watched a plane stall and pancake in on that turn one year. Only minor injuries IIRC but it could have been worse.
This is great advice - I know when I put the little lady in the back, with a couple of her bags, my landings are different than when I'm alone. Throw in the fact that you might be a bit tired, need to use the WC, and coming off the adrenaline of the near-miss you just experienced in the congo line, it's good to practice.Load your plane up to the payload you’ll be carrying in and figure those settings out for yourself. That’s the only way to figure it out. Check your stall speeds out to loaded down. Practice spot landing too. Also, watch videos on the arrivals to familiarize with it. It’s chaotic to say the least. Good luck. It’s one heck of an adventure.
Especially true in the 10. With back seats empty, you are significantly nose down on final. Load it up to gross and you are flat.This is great advice - I know when I put the little lady in the back, with a couple of her bags, my landings are different than when I'm alone. Throw in the fact that you might be a bit tired, need to use the WC, and coming off the adrenaline of the near-miss you just experienced in the congo line, it's good to practice.
18 is the tightest pattern. That is why the tower stays with 36 until absolutely necessary to use 18. There have been several fatal accidents in the distant past base to final and even on the runway on 18.This confuses me. When I watch videos of approaches the base turn is happening a lot closer to the water.
I am under the impression that the tight turn downwind to final is 18.
Many decades ago as a new Commercial Piot I was flying the entire Piper single engine line, the Twin Commanche and Aztec, Beech 18 and Aero Commander 560. In addition to my Wittman Tailwind and a bunch of other airplanes. With the exception of the multi engines I mostly just got in them and checked myself out.
I don't remember ever asking "what power setting do I need to fly 90 knots"
Anyone who asks that question needs additional training.
Children of the magenta line!!!