In fairness these installation requirements are purely due to inherent weaknesses in the PP. my $75 ND has no forced air, no heat shielding on it or the exhaust near it, no special rubber boots on the connector, belt is 1/4” out of alignment axially, turn alt field on after engine start up religiously, etc. 1600 hours of trouble free service. I understand that hartzell likes to blame these problems on installation issues, but in reality all the other alternators are subject to the same issues, yet give long service.
Again - let's compare apples to apples ...
1. How many amps does your $75 ND produce and what does your electrical system consume (I'm guessing this is the RV-6)? (ND is typically a 40A unit)
2. What's the pulley diameter - engine and alternator each.
3. Plane Power and ND have each used 3 different connectors over the years - 2 pin, 3 pin (2 different versions), 4 pin. In all likelihood your ND uses the round three pin - captive spade terminals, maybe the stacked box 2 pin - again with captive spade terminals. The broken wire symptom seems to be specific to the 3 pin inline "Sumitomo" - "Toyota", small pin variant, oval connector (Plug Code 3312). As an aside - another problem is the wiring type - Plane Power provides stiff, non MIL-W-22759/16 wire. Without isolation/damping it will fracture and break -- right around 200 hours with a propellor > .5ips.
4. 1/4" out -- and you haven't smoked the belt? Wow...Must be all that clean living.
The majority of those apply equally to any alternator whether PP, auto or B&C.
The specific PP ones are - well - specific things that could have been rectified any time in the last 15y. But haven’t been. Maybe the new owners have embarked upon an R&D drive to address them, make them cheaper and more reliable.
The only charitable thing you can say about the PP is that the large number of failures are simply just a result of a large install base because it’s been the Vans default for probably 15y+.
Maybe if they’d picked B&C as their preferred supplier for their FWF back in the day we would be seeing endless “another B&C alternator problem” threads. But I suspect not.
I’m all for nutting out the root causes of the failures and I also agree that an automotive solution is entirely viable for the attentive builder. But anyone reading these threads that just wants to go flying with high dispatch reliability and no messing about…
+1 on all points.
The difference here is B&C looked at the PP and ND failures and made changes to their product (refined balancing, 2 point mounting, external regulation -> less wire to break, no blast cooling needed). In their defense, Plane Power also made changes to their product over the years but still came up short IMHO (wave washers, captive stator, through bolts) as the root causes of their failures weren't well understood or the fixes were deemed too costly and never done.
On nutting out root causes --
@rocketbob (rest in peace) carried on about how crappy the PP was, etc. I offered to perform an autopsy on one of his failed units and he agreed. After I cleaned up the oil and dirt soaked unit, installed a fresh 3 pin connector, the unit worked fine on my bench. I took the unit to the local retail auto part shop, and used their tester (D&V ALT 98 and ALT 198 -- I trained the staff on how to use it

-- the unit passed with flying colors and is now being used on an RV-10.
This, and the results of other autopsies I've performed, are what led me to my conclusions about the suitability and shortcomings of the plane power unit (all generations).