Van's Air Force

The definitive Van's Aircraft support community! Buying, building or flying an RV? Join our exclusive family of mentors and enthusiasts!

Condition Inspection Cost

Were these the result of the owner doing their own CI’s?
I don't know. But there are lots of post about aluminum build quality but I don't recall these caused accidents. But it seems when the engine stumbles, like the RV8 that had a fuel related problem and crashed on take off, bad outcomes happened. This RV8 was flown by the builder. There was another RV8 at the field that had a fuel related problem but for the grace of God, landed safely. It was also flown by the builder.
 
Excellent post.

I would never trust my RV or the Bucker with an AP/AI who didn’t have direct and extensive experience with type unless I was involved. Even at that, I’m going to be involved. I had several AP’s deny my request for services as an owner assist for the Bucker. They simply wouldn’t do owner assist. “Not cost effective and we’re too busy….” Or “we don’t do owner assist.”
I moved on.

You’re lucky if you can find someone you can work with and trust.

To date, I have only done about 50 CI’s and annuals, so I’m still learning..
Every year there is something new learned. Maybe not a major “fall out of the sky” thing but a new technique or something obvious that most, even experienced guys, just don’t know or do.

I consider wrenching on my airplanes a part of my “hobby”, for “entertainment and education” right?
I won’t own an airplane I don’t know intimately, but I would encourage everyone to have some involvement with the inter workings of their machine.
Agree on all. Harder to find those good A&P/IA's who are knowledgeable in EAB & willing to work on them for sure, but worth the search. I had my 1st join CBP, another retired, and a third that moved. Each time I had to shop around for a while, so to speak.

And the one annual I didn't assist with... A shop that claimed their insurance wouldn't allow anyone other than licensed mechanics in the hangar. Not sure that's truly a thing, but I was in a pinch & gave it a try. Was my most expensive annual & I spent that year wondering just how complete it was since I wasn't present for it. Won't do that again.
 
I don't know. But there are lots of post about aluminum build quality but I don't recall these caused accidents. But it seems when the engine stumbles, like the RV8 that had a fuel related problem and crashed on take off, bad outcomes happened. This RV8 was flown by the builder. There was another RV8 at the field that had a fuel related problem but for the grace of God, landed safely. It was also flown by the builder.
Sorry. I thought we were discussing the difference between doing it yourself or having a “pro” do it. Not matter. You’re absolutely right.
 
Of course none of this applies to you Bob, you’re my hero :rolleyes:
Your ego probably wouldn’t have done well at the airlines, 3 sets of eyes/signatures on flt critical stuff.

Really Walt?

This is what I said: "Or the best…depends on the person."

Ok, quick quiz.

Can you tell me about my EFII system, how to inspect it, where to inspect it, and what to look for?

Can you tell me about my extended range fuel tanks and their related systems, what to inspect, where to inspect, and how to test that they work correctly?

Can you inspect my electrical system and tell me what's wrong (if anything)? Better yet, can you describe how it works?

I am sure that given enough time, you could figure it out but not at $175/hour, while you are trying to learn my aircraft.

I have no problem with your rate; that wasn't what the comment was about. You are paid for what you know. Unfortunately, you will never know more about my airplane than I do. Or any other builder here with their aircraft.

You also, automatically assumed that I am the only one looking at my aircraft during a CI. Incorrect again; I always have an additional set of eyes working with me. They are the eyes of someone else that has successfully built a -10.

The point is really simple; the person who knows the most about their individual aircraft is the person who built it, not an A&P that has spent 30 years looking at Boeing aircraft or certified spam cans. That is not a dig at those mechanics but truth nonetheless. Could those mechanics learn the individual aircraft they are supposed to be inspecting? Sure, but that takes time and I'm pretty sure they aren't going to do it for free.

It has nothing to do with ego, Walt.

Also, I am absolutely grateful for the three sets of eyes on flight critical stuff at the airlines...it's kept me flying safely for 34 years now.
 
Can someone PLEASE correct the title of this thread? I'm quite sure that Ironflight is climbing the walls (and I'm not far behind him).

IT'S A CONDITION INSPECTION! Not conditional.

[ed. Done. dr]
I was itching to say this... it stood uncorrected for 56 replies. What else did we miss when inspecting this thread?
 
Was your annual inspection actually performed in accordance with Part 43, Appendix D? According to Part 43, Appendix D (a) "Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall, before that inspection,...................... He shall thoroughly clean the aircraft and aircraft engine."

If he returned it dirty, the annual was not done properly! You canNOT properly inspect a dirty aircraft.

Ditto on what Walt said. "Bring it to me clean or expect to pay to get it cleaned!"
ive never inspected a dirty airplane, if someone does not care about their aircraft enough to keep it clean, then I do not want anything to do with it!
 
Building and inspecting are two different skill sets. A dedicated builder who finishes a hi quality build has certainly seen every nook, cranny and rivet and is justifiably proud of his/her creation, but without any other experience is this builder qualified to inspect this same machine as it wears and ages? I would say not really until inspection experience is acquired. In the meantime time join forces and share what you know with a mechanic with some experience, ideally RV knowledge. If not available the next best choice is someone with a fair amount of piston GA experience. A guy that can inspect a Cessna/Piper/Mooney will know things and find lots of commonality with the RV’s.

Don Broussard (Older A&P/IA)
RV9 Rebuild in Progress
57 Pacer
 
A lot comes down to your knowledge and knowledge base . Some owners are lucky to be at an airport with a knowledge base … help each other out , borrowing tools , parts , share their knowledge. Easy to get help with an inspection .

But if you’re not knowledgeable, not the builder and a lone wolf at the airport…. You have zip .
Plus there are plenty of owners that just want to fly and write a check ….. You think the average Cirrus Owner is looking for an Owner Assisted Annual …. Highly unlikely… his time is more valuable than $175 per hour .
Most of us RV Builders are regular Joes , enjoyed the building/ learning process and would rather gain more knowledge & not write the check .
 
In recent years I've been doing some pre-buys, a cursory form of the more extensive condition inspection. None of the airplanes are new, so someone has inspected them annually, often for 10 or more years, both builders and A&P's. Yet I still find things which, in my opinion, don't look safe, or would work better if done differently.

What we have here is a difference of opinion. In every case, someone thought the subject component or arrangement was safe to fly. Considering they were presented as flying airplanes rather than piles of salvage, every inspector's opinion was arguably valid.

Point is, I'm not convinced there is merit in arguing about who does the best annual, pro or builder, as I've not seen a whole lot of difference. Some inspectors are obviously picky, some are not, and it has nothing to do with certificates or invoices.
 
A lot comes down to your knowledge and knowledge base . Some owners are lucky to be at an airport with a knowledge base … help each other out , borrowing tools , parts , share their knowledge. Easy to get help with an inspection .

But if you’re not knowledgeable, not the builder and a lone wolf at the airport…. You have zip .
Plus there are plenty of owners that just want to fly and write a check ….. You think the average Cirrus Owner is looking for an Owner Assisted Annual …. Highly unlikely… his time is more valuable than $175 per hour .
Most of us RV Builders are regular Joes , enjoyed the building/ learning process and would rather gain more knowledge & not write the check .
That's my situation, although I'm not a builder. I'm at a moderate-size un-towered regional airport with avionics and maintenance shops and three helicopter companies, but no experimental aviation presence. In fact I'm the only person in two local EAA chapters with an E-AB of any kind...one chapter at my home airport and one at another airport 10 miles in the other direction from my house. Overall, I'm pleased with my decision to buy into experimental aviation, but it does come with challenges.
 
Last edited:
I completed my first homebuilt airplane in July 1964.
The following month I was hired at an approved repair station as an apprentice mechanic. I very quickly learned that some of the old timers did not do and probably did not know how to do quality work.
I cannot even make a reasonable guess as to how many A&P's do not do quality work and are completely lacking in the skills to do a condition inspection on EAB aircraft. I will only say it is much too high a percentage and has gotten worse over the years.
I have friends who are A&P and AI's who are certainly capable of building a Grand Champion EAB. Unfortunately there are others who are not capable of building a quality EAB much less a GC.
Whether an approved school or an apprentice program the typical A&P training today in most cases does not teach welding, woodwork, fabric covering etc. Restoration of antique and vintage airplanes may be at an all time high. The A&P's and AI's to support this simply do not exist.
The only work an A&P has ever done on my EAB aircraft since 1964 is helping with engine overhaul. My current airplane I farmed out the machine work and assembled the engine myself.
Some of the A&P's that I have known over the last 60 years operated one person shops. No one to inspect their work.
 
Can someone PLEASE correct the title of this thread? I'm quite sure that Ironflight is climbing the walls (and I'm not far behind him).

IT'S A CONDITION INSPECTION! Not conditional.

[ed. Done. dr]
For me, seeing that title was just like hearing fingernails go down a chalkboard.
 
I completed my first homebuilt airplane in July 1964.
The following month I was hired at an approved repair station as an apprentice mechanic. I very quickly learned that some of the old timers did not do and probably did not know how to do quality work.
I cannot even make a reasonable guess as to how many A&P's do not do quality work and are completely lacking in the skills to do a condition inspection on EAB aircraft. I will only say it is much too high a percentage and has gotten worse over the years.
I have friends who are A&P and AI's who are certainly capable of building a Grand Champion EAB. Unfortunately there are others who are not capable of building a quality EAB much less a GC.
Whether an approved school or an apprentice program the typical A&P training today in most cases does not teach welding, woodwork, fabric covering etc. Restoration of antique and vintage airplanes may be at an all time high. The A&P's and AI's to support this simply do not exist.
The only work an A&P has ever done on my EAB aircraft since 1964 is helping with engine overhaul. My current airplane I farmed out the machine work and assembled the engine myself.
Some of the A&P's that I have known over the last 60 years operated one person shops. No one to inspect their work.
Some of us who have been an A&P for several decades will tell you that their A&P license was a license to learn more and not a certificate that we know everything.
 
I have friends who are A&P and AI's who are certainly capable of building a Grand Champion EAB. Unfortunately there are others who are not capable of building a quality EAB much less a GC.
The A&P profession is no different than any other trade, construction, mechanic, farmer, doctor, etc. There are good ones and bad ones.

I was fortunate to come up when it was still acceptable for your mentors to yell at you, ridicule you, and haze you till you learned true craftsmanship. Those teaching methods are no longer acceptable, and we are seeing the resulting decline in craftsmanship.

Example; I broke a radial head on a bone in my arm. The repair involved squaring and reaming the end bone and installing a little titanium doorknob. Unfortunately the doctor couldn't read a tape measure let alone a caliper and reamed to 6mm for a 5mm spud. I was better with my questioning of the next doctor who I paid to fix the first screwup. But I'm still confident given access to meds, many of the carpenters and millwrights I've worked with over the years would have done a better job than either of the doctors. :D
 
The A&P profession is no different than any other trade, construction, mechanic, farmer, doctor, etc. There are good ones and bad ones.

I was fortunate to come up when it was still acceptable for your mentors to yell at you, ridicule you, and haze you till you learned true craftsmanship. Those teaching methods are no longer acceptable, and we are seeing the resulting decline in craftsmanship.
I agree. Physician training is basically a 6-8 year apprenticeship. And as you imply and as in other professions, today's young doctors-in-training are rather prone to getting their feelings hurt by their mentors.
 
Whether an approved school or an apprentice program the typical A&P training today in most cases does not teach welding, woodwork, fabric covering etc. Restoration of antique and vintage airplanes may be at an all time high. The A&P's and AI's to support this simply do not exist.
Having recently completed my A&P and training through a part 147 approved school, this statement is very true. One lab doing a butt weld of some sheet steel with an oxy acetylene torch. No wood work (just inspection of an old wooden spar on an Aeronca). A simple fabric covering project with Poly-fiber, and learning some knots to tie. Most of the curriculum is solely to pass the various written, oral and practical tests. 98% of the students are headed to the airlines and will never work on an Experimental or GA aircraft.

I have been doing the occasional condition inspection on RV's and they are all unique. I have found dozens of issues (and have the photos to prove it). No maintenance manuals to follow, but there are lots of excellent inspection checklists out there to follow. I can certainly see why most GA shops don't want to touch an Experimental, nor should an RV owner want to use most GA shops that have no RV experience.
 
Have had the same shop to my annual for the past five years. The cost has crept up a bit, but this year it was $2k MORE.
Last year it was $2500 and this year it was $4500. When I ask why:
“Your past flat rate was 11 hours at $128 an hour. I went online and found that I was way under market. The median is 16 hours.”
The new shop rate per hour is $138.
After the flat rate of 16 hours are six SBs @.5. ie -connecting rods inspection, wing aft spar inspection, elevator spar inspection, inspect wing and bolt attach,ents, horizontal stab spar inspection, fuel injector line inspection.
$4500 seems to me to be in line for a Mooney or Beech annual. How much are you paying? Does your mechanic charge a flat rate rather than hours actually worked? Finally hy are the SBs not included in the flat rate?
Since the original question was cost of a CI from a non-builder, I'll add my experience. I'm on my 10th EAB and 7th RV. I did not build any of them, for various reasons, and greatly admire builders who do quality work. I've owned my latest RV for 4 years and all the CI's have been done by a Cirrus center (KSFF). The A&P/IA has experience with EAB aircraft (hard to find). I do all the prep work, no outsiders allowed in the shop, and the flat rate has been about $2100. They provide a list of recommended work, and approximate cost if I want them to do it (rare). I've appreciated the extra set of eyes.

Just an additional note about CI/Annual costs for us non-builders. Maybe they were never cheap, but the increasing cost (in addition to insurance, etc) helps tip the scales for some of us to get out of aviation. I considered selling my 9A several months ago and buying a Navion. The $20K price for the last Annual changed mind. Maybe the EAB thing isn't so bad.
 
I considered selling my 9A several months ago and buying a Navion. The $20K price for the last Annual changed mind. Maybe the EAB thing isn't so bad.
Definitely is not, iMHO. My -9A has been the cheapest airplane to own and fly in my 50+ years of owning and flying airplanes.
 
Definitely is not, iMHO. My -9A has been the cheapest airplane to own and fly in my 50+ years of owning and flying airplanes.
20 years here, same report. My -9A has been the cheapest to own and operate.
 
Have had the same shop to my annual for the past five years. The cost has crept up a bit, but this year it was $2k MORE.
Last year it was $2500 and this year it was $4500. When I ask why:
“Your past flat rate was 11 hours at $128 an hour. I went online and found that I was way under market. The median is 16 hours.”
The new shop rate per hour is $138.
After the flat rate of 16 hours are six SBs @.5. ie -connecting rods inspection, wing aft spar inspection, elevator spar inspection, inspect wing and bolt attach,ents, horizontal stab spar inspection, fuel injector line inspection.
$4500 seems to me to be in line for a Mooney or Beech annual. How much are you paying? Does your mechanic charge a flat rate rather than hours actually worked? Finally hy are the SBs not included in the flat rate?
How long did this take?
What did the hours require increase?
What work are you doing to decrease the time?
 
Add one more to report the same. With its simple systems there really wasn't much to require maintenance. It was a good plane for us.
Exactly. RVs are the Mazda Miatas of the Skies: sporty, relatively inexpensive, there’s only so much that can break, and often you can fix it yourself. 🤣
 
The average builder/owner maybe the worst inspector of his own aircraft for various reasons.
True, but on the flip side, paid "inspectors" will likely find and you will pay a lot of money for work that isn't necessary.
 
True, but on the flip side, paid "inspectors" will likely find and you will pay a lot of money for work that isn't necessary.

Defining "not necessary" is the trick. Strictly speaking, nothing is proven to be necessary until failure.

Day before yesterday, I found myself on the phone explaining how to find the sump strainer...to an owner on his third RV.
 
Defining "not necessary" is the trick. Strictly speaking, nothing is proven to be necessary until failure.

Day before yesterday, I found myself on the phone explaining how to find the sump strainer...to an owner on his third RV.
I've seen this in person, original Lyc paint and safety wire on the sump plug after many years of "condition inspections" by owner.
One I distinctly remember had big chunks of what ended up being broken lifter body pieces come out when removed the plug.
Owner actually asked me if we could put it back together and just keep an eye on it as it was running fine (you imagine my response to that).
He never knew a sump screen even existed.
 
Last edited:
The average builder/owner maybe the worst inspector of his own aircraft for various reasons.
I don't like to use generalizations because the exception confirms the rule, but when I bought my RV-8 it had been built and inspected by the same person for 10 years. When I bought it I had someone inspect it. What wasn't caught in the pre-buy was then later caught by another person during my CI. We realized it was missing a whole mess of bolts attaching the wing to the fuselage. Kind of important, I'd say. Those missing bolts turned into a few threads here too.

We're humans and miss things so I get a different set of eyes to take a look at my aircraft, what one misses I hope the next will find.
 
One thing I have not seen discussed on this specific issue, is that A&Ps have gone through approx 3 years of school to become an A&P. Of course, there are some that get that training through the military, etc., and they can test out. But, since we have gone through that training, we expect to make a profit like any other job.
I have completed many CI's and Annual Inspections in the last thirty six years of being an A&P/IA. I have seen aircraft brought to me in awesome condition and horrible conditions. You can tell who does and does not take care of their aircraft.
I charge a flat rate, but additional cost if something out of the realm of the CI is found. $100/hr is not out of the ball park! It also takes me a minimum three days of full time work to accomplish a CI. Anybody doing it in a day, is not doing everything necessary in my opinion, as these things take time. I also only do CI's on Vans aircraft and other metal experimental aircraft, but I also do a few Annuals on certified aircraft. Everything has a cost associated with it. You want someone who KNOWS the specific aircraft they are inspecting!
I have also built many RVs, and I ALWAYS have a group of the Vans guys in town come over for an inspection party!!! Anybody can miss a mistake they made, because their brain tells them they did it right the first time!! Great group of guys, by the way!
 
Over here in wet and windy England we can do our own annual inspections which is then checked by our local LAA Inspector and signed off, each of the last two years annual has cost me under £600 including LAA Inspector fees, and the LAA Permit renewal fee along with Oil and filters etc all changed. On my previous aircraft which was a certified aircraft (RS180 Sportsman) we were delighted if the annual was under £5,000. On one year we got stung £13,000!!!. This was one of the key reasons why I went down the Permit to Fly route (Experimental for you US guys).
 
One thing I have not seen discussed on this specific issue, is that A&Ps have gone through approx 3 years of school to become an A&P. Of course, there are some that get that training through the military, etc., and they can test out. But, since we have gone through that training, we expect to make a profit like any other job.
Making a profit is expected, I'd say mandatory, if you're doing it for a living. Does that mean that since I have 3 ATPs, CFI-I in airplanes, helicopters, seaplanes, gyroplanes, and 4 decades doing it, I should charge $1000+ an hour to teach? It's cost me a lot to get these ratings and experience. Seriously now, every job takes time to learn it, but that doesn't mean prices should be set by that alone.

PS: I've never charged a penny to teach and my airport (don't get me started on the many hundreds of thousands I've spent here) is free to use by everyone who comes here.
 
“Your past flat rate was 11 hours at $128 an hour. I went online and found that I was way under market. The median is 16 hours.”
The new shop rate per hour is $138.

I can’t afford myself if I charge myself $138/hr. I don’t track my time but I would guess I typically spend >25 hours on my condition inspection (CI). Of coarse I usually roll into my CI a few upgrades, mods, refreshes plus at least 8 hours of cleaning.
(It would be considerably more if I added all the time I spend trying to find a tool that I used the last time I did the CI. )
 
Back
Top