We won’t know until he find out. Most PE firms want to maximize profits. Look at Thoma Bravo for example.Educate me as to why this is a bad thing. Currently owned by a chinese equity firm. Will be owned by an American equity firm. Seems like a win to me.
Pretty much everything they have acquired resulted in a doubling of the retail price along with substantially higher repair costs. These speculative PE firms tend to find brands with strong and sticky demand that have financial issues. They inject the cash necessary and then milk that demand with generally very large price increases untill the demand dries up, then sell the assets. Its a fairly profitable approach when there are smart people running the show, but it tends to be unpleasant for the consumer and often results in driving the brand out of the business; Eventually competitors arrive with more realistic prices, but not always the case. In the interim, customers get a wallet dent. In cases like ours, the market is small, so competitors don't rush in.Educate me as to why this is a bad thing. Currently owned by a chinese equity firm. Will be owned by an American equity firm. Seems like a win to me.
+1... This is no bueno for the GA community IMHO. Of course it depends on which side of the table you sit on. Private equity (PE) ownership often leads to efforts to improve efficiency, margins, and pricing power, which translates to rising prices for engines, parts, and related services. PE firms typically acquire companies with stable cash flows and aim for 3–7 year holds to generate strong returns. Aftermarket parts/services (high-margin) are common targets. I suspect we're gonna see aggressive pricing strategies. PE firms do whats in the best interest of their bottom line... not the interest of the GA community. A Gordon Gekko kind of move.Pretty much everything they have acquired resulted in a doubling of the retail price along with substantially higher repair costs. These speculative PE firms tend to find brands with strong and sticky demand that have financial issues. They inject the cash necessary and then milk that demand with generally very large price increases untill the demand dries up, then sell the assets. Its a fairly profitable approach when there are smart people running the show, but it tends to be unpleasant for the consumer and often results in driving the brand out of the business; Eventually competitors arrive with more realistic prices, but not always the case. In the interim, customers get a wallet dent. In cases like ours, the market is small, so competitors don't rush in.
If these guys start doubling conti prices, we can hope that superior sees the opportunity and steps things up to improve quality, keep prices constant and see a big boost in revenue.. Also possible they just follow suit, then everything is priced at Lyc levels. I see a scenariowhere this can drive things MUCH worse than they are right now depending upon how this plays out.
?? There are three companies selling engine parts. Do you not see them as competitors?They can command the high prices because there is no competition for the aviation parts.
Parts market is very different. Conti is right in line with superior and they are typically 2/3-1/2 the lyc price.I don't see prices for our titan engines going up much. They are already pretty much in line with lycoming. I think I saved 1, maybe 2 grand but gained 2 years of not waiting. The only reason I went with Titan was the reduced lead time.
It was announced today that Cirrus is barred from any DOW contracts because of being Chinese owned.
The feds have mostly given up enforcement except in the largest examples. Even then, most get away with it these days. Companies are smart and don’t go for traditional monopolies, just strong vertical integration and consolidation without removing all competitors. On paper it looks fair, in reality they just leave the competition with sub par performance.Isn’t there supposed to be some laws that protect consumers from monopolies? Those laws should be able to track this type of ownership control before there is an actual monopoly. Maybe that doesn’t apply to foreign ownership.
That is good to see they may have come to their senses. Question is why. I wonder if word is getting out about the reliability issues.As an aside -- shortly after Arcline, et al, purchased Plane Power/Hartzell Engine Technologies, the retail price of the Plane Power Alternator AL12EI60/B kit shot up to ~$1600 at 'Spruce, Airpower, others.
Checking again this AM, shows the price for this unit has dropped back down to near earth orbit levels -- $866.00 for the kit, $639.81 for the alternator.
Before the acquisition, the price was ~$600ish for the kit IIRC. So only a 44% increase or so![]()
That is good to see they may have come to their senses. Question is why. I wonder if word is getting out about the reliability issues.
I think they realize dollar and cents matter even if they corner the market of PP products.That is good to see they may have come to their senses. Question is why. I wonder if word is getting out about the reliability issues.
Me too. The IP has already gone and I bet there is a conti clone in Chinese drones.(I'm amazed they are selling it, and part of me says I'll believe it when it's actually done.)
To be fair to the Chinese I really don’t think they would have to buy a company to be able to come up with a horizontally opposed 4/6 pot engine. They’ve been around for decades.Me too. The IP has already gone and I bet there is a conti clone in Chinese drones.
The IP is useless without the tribal knowledge. Bob the veteran machinist knows that you always make XYZ123 part to the high side of the tolerance because the castings for ABC789 part run a little tight, etc..... He teaches this to Scott, the new hire out of trade school.Me too. The IP has already gone and I bet there is a conti clone in Chinese drones.
That might be a reason for China selling - - Conti has been on the edge since I worked there in '85. They did a lot of outside (military) contracts on various things to keep fresh money coming in and share usage of engineering talent. That could directly affect the balance sheet if terminated by DoW. All speculation of course.I don't see prices for our titan engines going up much. They are already pretty much in line with lycoming. I think I saved 1, maybe 2 grand but gained 2 years of not waiting. The only reason I went with Titan was the reduced lead time.
It was announced today that Cirrus is barred from any DOW contracts because of being Chinese owned.