Van's Air Force

The definitive Van's Aircraft support community! Buying, building or flying an RV? Join our exclusive family of mentors and enthusiasts!

A/P roll servo install

Kenman

I'm New Here
Greetings: I am in the process of populating the "basement" of my Rocket.
I searched for ideas / photos of autopilot roll sevo installs and didn't find what I was looking for.
Thanks for your time,
Ken
 
Greetings: I am in the process of populating the "basement" of my Rocket.
I searched for ideas / photos of autopilot roll sevo installs and didn't find what I was looking for.
Thanks for your time,
Ken
Sorry don't have any pictures of the servo install but when I built a F1 I put in the box section where the joy stick is and attached it to the base of the joy stick.
 
There are 4 common locations for actuation. The following describes the attach point of the servo’s actuator rod. The servo is mounted so as to achieve the actuation point described.
-in the wing (I’ve not considered this)
-under floor to the weldment below the fwd stick attach point; fwd of the spar
-under floor to the aileron pushrod attach point; aft of the spar
-under floor further aft to a tab on the torque tube.
Here’s a link that addresses them:
If you search the -4 forum there is a lot more archived info available.
 
-under floor to the aileron pushrod attach point; aft of the spar
I'm in the middle of doing this right now now, and planning on doing this approach.

I'm just finishing up my pitch servo & trim and yaw servo & trim and was planning to do roll next as it looked straight forward without needing anything custom from Send Cut Send.
 
I’m planning to install a roll servo in my Rocket this winter. By the looks of it, it should fit nicely next to the pilot’s control stick. I’ll probably mount the bracket using hi-lok fasteners through the bottom of the fuselage. I have considered just gluing the bracket to the floor with 3M 2216, but with such a critical component, I’d sleep better at night knowing that there are some mechanical fasteners in place.

Edited…. I see now that my label is wrong. It should say ‘extra wire for ROLL servo.’ I also have problems distinguishing left from right. 😏

IMG_2010.jpeg
 
I’m planning to install a roll servo in my Rocket this winter. By the looks of it, it should fit nicely next to the pilot’s control stick. I’ll probably mount the bracket using hi-lok fasteners through the bottom of the fuselage. I have considered just gluing the bracket to the floor with 3M 2216, but with such a critical component, I’d sleep better at night knowing that there are some mechanical fasteners in place.

Edited…. I see now that my label is wrong. It should say ‘extra wire for ROLL servo.’ I also have problems distinguishing left from right. 😏

View attachment 101287
My thanks to all that replied! I'm glad I asked. R, Ken
 
Here's how I mounted my Dynon roll servo. Lots of dust in my hangar so excuse the dirty parts, they aren't covered up yet.


20251105_154242.jpg20251105_154300.jpg20251105_154319(1).jpg
 
Copied mine from Finnflyer, IIRC. Used Garmin actuators.

My initial concerns with other methods =
Attachment at the aileron push tube location would require uneven servo force depending on actuation direction. This approach since been validated.

Attachment via Dynon method would require an attachment band fabrication or welding an attach point to the control column.

The Finnflyer approach afforded balanced, required servo forces in each direction, a decent moment arm at the actuation attach point (easier on the actuator), and mainly easy custom fabrication. Only had to brake a single piece of metal and attach via common fasteners.

Lots of validated options available to you but consideration of your available tools and skill set before proceeding is warranted.

Enjoy this part of your journey.

IMG_6413.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Attachment at the aileron push tube location would require uneven servo force depending on actuation direction. This approach since been validated.
What do you mean by validated, that the uneven force is validated, or that many planes have worked in this configuration? I can't imagine the push tube force is too uneven. On our RV7 it was in the wing, and also against the push tubes. Maybe the geometry is better in the wing as there is less rotation.
 
What do you mean by validated, that the uneven force is validated, or that many planes have worked in this configuration? I can't imagine the push tube force is too uneven. On our RV7 it was in the wing, and also against the push tubes. Maybe the geometry is better in the wing as there is less rotation.
Validation means exactly that. The implementation works as intended.

Ideally, the actuator would be at its null point and the linkage 90 degrees to the arm. Same for the connection at the other end of the linkage.

On the applications I’ve witnesses that utilize the same connection point as the p-p tube, the geometry deviates from the aforementioned. The resulting kinematics would require different forces for equal displacements on either side of null. As I didn’t know of a flying aircraft with that configuration, I didn’t go that way.

Reference the penultimate sentence in my post. It’s just another option for the OP.
 
Minor detail, best practice.

When installing a cantilevered single shear bolt, put the threads on the outer end, not in the arm or structure. If forced to place the threads at the base of the cantilever, use a slightly longer bolt so the shank extends all the way through the arm enough that the root thread is above the surface, then take up the excess with as many as three washers.

ScreenHunter_2997 Nov. 07 08.53.jpg

20251105_154319(1).jpg
 
Minor detail, best practice.

When installing a cantilevered single shear bolt, put the threads on the outer end, not in the arm or structure. If forced to place the threads at the base of the cantilever, use a slightly longer bolt so the shank extends all the way through the arm enough that the root thread is above the surface, then take up the excess with as many as three washers.

View attachment 101485

View attachment 101483

No comment about (blind) rivets being subjected to tensile loads?
 
This is the thread/post referred to.

 
This is the thread/post referred to.

And I’m convinced your approach (and Scott Hersha and others) bests other’s in the majority of applications. Was gonna go the shared P-P tube attachment point originally. Still an elegant solution in the right application but there would have been a lot of related arranging/configuring/etc. of potential interference between pending footwells, vent SCAT, pending harness runs etc. not to mention the aforementioned uneven force-balance concern; though the latter turned out to be non-issue.

The dead space near the forward part of the control column never entered my mind. Very convinced the knowledge you guys shared here saved me a lot of time and potentially associated grief.

Thanks again.
 
Here's pics of my application - aft of the spar. I subsequently removed the aileron trim, it is completely unnecessary in mine (EVO wing) and just adds to the aileron stick force. I also changed out the Trutrak autopilot and its servos for the Garmin units, again reducing the aileron stick forces.

Roll Servo Aileron Trim 1.jpgRoll Servo Aileron Trim 2.jpg
Roll Servo Aileron Trim 3.jpgRoll Servo Aileron Trim 4.jpg
 
I originally installed under the floor, and then moved it to the wing just for ease of inspection. And honestly didn't like the "clamp to the tube" method of attachment.
 
Minor detail, best practice.

When installing a cantilevered single shear bolt, put the threads on the outer end, not in the arm or structure. If forced to place the threads at the base of the cantilever, use a slightly longer bolt so the shank extends all the way through the arm enough that the root thread is above the surface, then take up the excess with as many as three washers.

View attachment 101485

View attachment 101483

Thanks Dan....easy fix.
 
Back
Top