From my analysis of such nose gear failures and reading the FAA's write-ups on these failures, the FAA finally deemed the nose gear was strong enough and safe enough to meet or exceed FAA standards as designed by Vans Aircraft, and they determined the accidents were more from pilot mishandling. Just look at the Cirrus SR20 and SR22 nose gear design, which uses exactly the same type of donut damper system that Van's newest nose gear design uses. In the NTSB accident reports, there have been many Cirrus nose gear failures too due to porpoised landing or simply putting too much load on the nose gear during landing and takeoffs. In addition, Van's had flown their RV-6A from their old grass strip for many years and many hours and around the country to many fly-ins and shows and has never experienced this issue. Their 9A was also flown for many years and hours to many fly-ins and shows with the original nose gear design (the one I use) and tire pressure and never had any problems there either -- it's all in the technique, keeping the nose gear light on ALL takeoffs and landings. Van's changed to the new design because some pilots simply don't now how to fly airplanes properly because many primary trainers are so forgiving -- right? In saying this, it's also important to keep the nose gear maintained to exactly what Van's calls-out in their builder's manual, which I do. Some RV owners have "gotten egg on their faces" attempting to be smarter than Van's engineering team. And being a longtime engineer myself, I understand and trust Van's team on this!



BTW -- pinched tubes are more from installation errors or not using talcum powder before installing the tube -- there's Vans instructions for that, too.