Freemasm
Well Known Member
Probably going to regret this post. Everyone knows avionics have gotten more sophisticated and expensive. Throw EFI/EI on top of that and the cost and complexity both increase, obviously. Their integration into the powerplant and related control increase this complexity. There have been articles advocating for a second engine ground for a while now.
Redundancy can be a double edged sword. A failed engine ground would land solidly in the lower right corner of an FMEA risk (low risk/high severity); a fact that makes this an interesting question (at least to me).
So, what have owners/builders of aircraft with any/all of the aforementioned done regarding such.
Redundancy can be a double edged sword. A failed engine ground would land solidly in the lower right corner of an FMEA risk (low risk/high severity); a fact that makes this an interesting question (at least to me).
So, what have owners/builders of aircraft with any/all of the aforementioned done regarding such.
Last edited: