Whirlwind does a nice job with their spinner design, and they call out explicitly not to run with just the filler plates attached.
If you are absolutely adamant to fly it home, the least I would do is add another screw and nut plate to the side that hasn't broken yet and on the side that broke, fashion a piece to roughly match the broken chunk of the spinner...clean the line up a bit, add a small internal splice plate to mate to the existing spinner with 3-4 rivets on either side of the splice plate and two screws fastening the new bit aft to the spinner bulkhead.
Yes, it will be slightly out of balance, though I doubt more than .2- .3 ips.vibration... While this is not a great solution, your cooling wouldn't be affected.
If however, on a test runup you could actually feel a significant vibration, then it's probably more like a .4-.6 ips vertical and I'd discontinue and wait for a new spinner.
A splice plate and a couple screws and one in the other side for good measure, would most likely get you home. But now you're back to being a test pilot. If that spinner fails in flight...it could suck.
For what it's worth, there is WAY too much un-supported rear flange on that spinner. Someone else said cantilevered beam with centripetal attachment and that's right...the whole time your engine is running, that 3" piece of un-supported metal on both side of your spinner are flapping and work hardening little by little. This will just happen again, unless you remedy the situation.
Steve