Serious popcorn shortage looming![]()
That is a rethorical question. Is there any evidence it's doing good? If yes what and how much good. That is the debate.So, I may have missed the bottom line here...is there any evidence that an air/oil separator causes any demonstrated harm to an airplane engine?
That is a rethorical question. Is there any evidence it's doing good? If yes what and how much good. That is the debate.
Yes, it was rhetorical. Since I already have one (not by my choice) I'm much more interested in whether on not it causes harm. In the absence of direct evidence or examples of engine damage caused by the device, I plan to leave it.
Sometimes issues turn into something akin to a college football game, when the reality is more nuanced.
This isn't a question of separator vs no separator. No one needs to lubricate the belly skin. The issue is crankcase return vs none.
It is entirely possible to create a harmful separator installation, i.e. one which returns liquid water to the crankcase. Simply cool the system, condensing water and fuel vapor to liquid. The separator will capture liquids, as intended. It doesn't care what kind of liquid.
It's also quite possible to install a system which maintains gas temperature above the dew point of water and fuel. The only liquid will be oil.
Inability to maintain separator temperature above dew point does not mean a separator is ill advised. However, it does preclude a sump return.
Mine does not go below the cowl but stops just short of it. If you put it in the airstream, it may cause a vacuum and actually draw the oil out of the case.Could someone post a photo of your Crankcase breather line with an explanation of how far it should be exposed below the cowl? Mine is quite short, and does not get into the airstream. I'm getting a lot of oil on the belly, and I wonder if the breather line is positioned incorrectly. Thanks!