You echo Chat GPT. It helped me put into words the following conclusions. I see similarities.Installation instructions are a good thing. Is the SureFly SIM powered directly from the battery? If not, every circuit breaker and/or switch can become a point of failure for your ignition. The only time you want to use a backup battery is with your second SIM. The first should go directly to the battery. Don't go down a rabbit hole with speculation, call SF tech support. The most tested piece of the puzzle is the SF SIM. Be open to looking elsewhere.
That said, I'm a little concerned that you still don't understand you have a problem with your aircraft. By using a separate battery for SF SIM power, you confirmed that your aircraft has an electrical issue (after a lot of finger pointing at the SureFly). Installing a Band-Aid backup battery is not the answer, nor is it part of the installation unless it is the second SIM.
P-Lead: It is a simple ground-open circuit. The ground tells the unit to turn off, the open to turn on. Check the wire and switch.
Ground: Check all terminals for proper crimps and corrosion.
Battery: Even though it spins the prop, doesn't mean it is good. Try a new one. If you are powering the SF SIM through a circuit breaker, switch, bus bar, or relay fix this immediately! Wire it directly to the aircraft battery.
I had a similar issue when I first installed the SureFly generation 1, many years ago. I cleaned the starter pad as that is the ground for the starter. Checked and cleaned all the terminals. Beefed up the engine to firewall ground. This not only fixed the SureFly issue but suddenly my starter worked as it should!
The breakthrough came when SureFly had me create an entirely isolated electrical system for the right ignition module. The isolated system did not interact with the aircraft electrical system. The left SureFly was turned off, and the engine was started using only the isolated right ignition module.
The result was dramatic: the engine hot-started really well! I could tell Fuel was still causing spits and sputter…but the single SIM was firing all it could. Never seen that before.
This test was valuable because it isolated the SureFly module from several possible influences at the same time:
- Voltage sag during start and compression events.
- Ground potential issues caused by the high current flow of the starter (200–400 amps).
- Electrical noise or current effects associated with the P-lead circuit.
- Interactions with the aircraft electrical system.
- Shared return paths through the aircraft grounding system.
The right SureFly module is capable of performing correctly when isolated from my aircraft’s electrical system.
My original installation did not follow SureFly’s recommended installation procedure. SureFly specifies that the module power supply should be connected directly to the aircraft battery. Instead, I connected the right module to an always-hot battery bus that is supplied from the battery side of the master relay. Although measured voltage during cranking appeared acceptable (approximately 11 volts), the hot-start problem remained.
This raises an important possibility: voltage alone may not tell the entire story. An electronic ignition module may respond not only to average voltage, but also to transient voltage changes during cranking. Each compression event places a varying load on the starter, which can create fluctuations in the electrical system that we saw as small and un-noteworthy on the oscilloscope.
SureFly’s recommendation to connect the module directly to the battery was likely made for a reason. The specific concerns behind that requirement have not been shared with me, so my battery-bus installation is now a strong area for further investigation.
The next step is additional experimentation with the power supply, the ground reference, the P-lead circuit, electrical noise.
At this point, we know the SureFly system can hot-start the engine reliably when removed from my aircraft’s electrical system.
This is Experimental Aviation.