I am performing my first condition inspection on an RV-12 with 912-ULS engine. Notes in the service records of the previous owner and original builder state, "SB 00026 - Did not comply; will check condition at each conditional insp."
SB 00026 directs me to install a new part, VA-00276, a Throttle Spring Retainer, to both carbs. The SB also directs me to Kit Assembly Instruction 50-05 for installation instructions. The problem is that the drawing of the Throttle Arm in said KAI 50-05 is not what is currently on the carb. The current setup has the Throttle Spring attached to an additional leg/hole on the throttle arm rather than to the throttle arm shaft. (See attached photo)
Would I be correct to assume the SB does not apply since there would be no wear to the shaft as the spring is not attached there? The only logbook entries that potentially address this is an engine log entry from Dec 2024 indicating that the carbs were sent out to Rotax for a 200 hour service. Would Rotax have replaced the throttle arm with a different one?
SB 00026 directs me to install a new part, VA-00276, a Throttle Spring Retainer, to both carbs. The SB also directs me to Kit Assembly Instruction 50-05 for installation instructions. The problem is that the drawing of the Throttle Arm in said KAI 50-05 is not what is currently on the carb. The current setup has the Throttle Spring attached to an additional leg/hole on the throttle arm rather than to the throttle arm shaft. (See attached photo)
Would I be correct to assume the SB does not apply since there would be no wear to the shaft as the spring is not attached there? The only logbook entries that potentially address this is an engine log entry from Dec 2024 indicating that the carbs were sent out to Rotax for a 200 hour service. Would Rotax have replaced the throttle arm with a different one?


