Mconner7
Well Known Member
A friend is grounding his flying club 1-82 with an IO-540 over this SB. How will this affect our community?
Last edited:
My 540 is only off by 1 to this list but it is a EL-xxxxx not a L-xxxxxx. I assume the E is for experimental? If this is true it’s interesting no experimental Lycoming engines were affected?A friend is grinding his flying club 1-82 with an IO-540 over this SB. How will this affect our community?
Both the certified and experimental lycomings come down the same line and are assembled from the same parts. My understanding is that the FAA can't really apply an AD to a product that doesn't have a type certificate. That doesn't mean that the condition doesn't exist potentially exist in an experimental engine, just that the legal mechanism doesn't allow for the inclusion in the AD. If I had an engine in this serial range with these part numbers installed, I'd be yanking it apart per the AD, experimental or not.My 540 is only off by 1 to this list but it is a EL-xxxxx not a L-xxxxxx. I assume the E is for experimental? If this is true it’s interesting no experimental Lycoming engines were affected?
And I have not seen an AD yet, just a mandatory SB.Both the certified and experimental lycomings come down the same line and are assembled from the same parts. My understanding is that the FAA can't really apply an AD to a product that doesn't have a type certificate. That doesn't mean that the condition doesn't exist potentially exist in an experimental engine, just that the legal mechanism doesn't allow for the inclusion in the AD. If I had an engine in this serial range with these part numbers installed, I'd be yanking it apart per the AD, experimental or not.
The highest concentration of serial numbers effected has a range of 634 serial numbers with 18% of that range listed as possible issues and 82% that Lycoming has stated there is no effect. Does Lycoming not tell experimental engine users that their engine might be affected, or do we just assume it is affected even though 82% of non-experimental engines in the range they say are ok? At this stage any assumptions is not a good idea and seems more data is needed. In addition, the Table number the serial number falls into highly effect what is needed. Mine falls in the range of Table 2 and remediation is recommended when removing a cylinder or overhaul. The SB runs until Dec 15th, 2025, (Table 3) which I guess they must have found recent issues but even the later ranges effected serial numbers skip over serial numbers sometimes 40 and 50 a part.Both the certified and experimental lycomings come down the same line and are assembled from the same parts. My understanding is that the FAA can't really apply an AD to a product that doesn't have a type certificate. That doesn't mean that the condition doesn't exist potentially exist in an experimental engine, just that the legal mechanism doesn't allow for the inclusion in the AD. If I had an engine in this serial range with these part numbers installed, I'd be yanking it apart per the AD, experimental or not.
oops, my bad. Thought that this was an AD, but I guess I was getting it confuse with another recent issue.And I have not seen an AD yet, just a mandatory SB.