Van's Air Force

The definitive Van's Aircraft support community! Buying, building or flying an RV? Join our exclusive family of mentors and enthusiasts!

Great job Greg! Vans EAA presentation

Gash

Well Known Member
Patron
I'm sitting here listening to Greg Hughes give the Vans RV Aircraft Kits presentation as part of EAA Homebuilders Week. I just wanted to say how impressed I am with the well organized and comprehensive information. Good stuff Greg!
 
No kidding! And great progress on the RV-15, it really seems to be coming together nicely with a lot of thought put into some very important details. And Brian/Ryan said they expect the empennage and wing kits to become available by the end of 2025. Sign me up.
 
No kidding! And great progress on the RV-15, it really seems to be coming together nicely with a lot of thought put into some very important details. And Brian/Ryan said they expect the empennage and wing kits to become available by the end of 2025. Sign me up.
Me Too!
 
I guess i should reserve my tent spot on the lawn outside of the Van’s factory. Maybe make a party out of it. Or a trip to Mecca to meet the airplane Gods and pick up a gift.
 
Can you share some of the RV-15 details? What have the done with the flap handle?
The flap handle was still of the Rube Goldberg variety, by their own admission, but the plan is to have the handle below the floor and route the rods through the b pillar, which is moving back four inches from current.

So if I remember a few of details right, they’ve pretty much made the RV-10 tail cone fit, but may change the rake of the rudder and vertical stabilizer to square things up a bit and make it look more “bush plane.” Just couldn’t get the stabilator to work well enough.

The made significant changes to the ailerons’ leading edges, adjusted the hinge brackets for optimal control feel (“flying down a winding river should not be tiring”), added vortex generators to the back of the flaps (looked like they would tuck under the wings in normal flight, not sure if that permanent), decreased the wing surface area from 172 sqft to 160, and made various improvements to improve the overall aerodynamics to get them to the 140 knot target. They said the exterior of the airframe was now pretty much complete and the focus was on interior stuff.

The tanks will be behind the newly designed spar, with a fuel cap that is placed for easy access when you’re on floats, 30 gal each side. And finally the cabin is for sure now the 2 + lots of cargo configuration. From the pictures we all saw that led to discussion around safety, they will raise the panel one inch, move it forward 2 inches, move the wings back 4 inches, which will give more head space, and widen the cabin to 48 inches, one wider than a C182. Looks like really good changes—they showed a picture with a 6’7” in the seat with lots of pillows on it and plenty of head room.

Overall it really looked like it was coming together very well. They showed a brief video with some very benign stall behavior, almost no deviation in an uncoordinated stall—nice. So lots of these little usability and performance improvements. No word on the kit parts beyond empennage and wings, but that’s a great start.
 
Seems like they may have really engineered the plane well for the backcountry mission. Not sure it still fits my mission though. I think i would like a more cessna 150 mission: smaller, simple , cheap utility. But wider cockpit high wing, large flaps to optimize wing area for high cruise speed so flaps could be used for slower approach speed. But that is just me. Their version really looks like a winner. Good luck Van’s
 
One thing I noted Rian saying during the questions at the end of the presentation is that the final-sized pre-punched holes will be 1/8" for pulled rivets. He mentioned that a builder could use solid rivets, but bucking 1/8" solid rivets could be a challenge for some.
 
Seems like they may have really engineered the plane well for the backcountry mission. Not sure it still fits my mission though. I think i would like a more cessna 150 mission: smaller, simple , cheap utility. But wider cockpit high wing, large flaps to optimize wing area for high cruise speed so flaps could be used for slower approach speed. But that is just me. Their version really looks like a winner. Good luck Van’s

Perhaps the Sonex High Wing will be an alternative for you? They also participated in the EAA webinars to provide an update on the prototype and kit. I too would like to build a Van's high wing, but the RV-15 expected kit cost and recommended engine and prop will likely be out of reach, just too much bush aeroplane for me! The ideal would have been a RV-9A high wing with the option of a Rotax engine. ;)
 
Perhaps the Sonex High Wing will be an alternative for you? They also participated in the EAA webinars to provide an update on the prototype and kit. I too would like to build a Van's high wing, but the RV-15 expected kit cost and recommended engine and prop will likely be out of reach, just too much bush aeroplane for me! The ideal would have been a RV-9A high wing with the option of a Rotax engine. ;)
Goodpoint, i really wonder how a rv9 type wing would do if it. Is thinned out for a strut-brace high wing design? Would it still have its high speed cruise, and high altitude capability, w docile handling? Maybe thr RV9’s excellent characteristics are not airfoil related, but just other things like span loading, wetted area, etc?
 
During Q&A, the first question out of the chute was asked about the RV-15 baggage door. Rian said they are not ready to show it and that it will be announced and displayed at Oshkosh. I am really looking forward to building a -15!
 
Seems like they may have really engineered the plane well for the backcountry mission. Not sure it still fits my mission though. I think i would like a more cessna 150 mission: smaller, simple , cheap utility. But wider cockpit high wing, large flaps to optimize wing area for high cruise speed so flaps could be used for slower approach speed. But that is just me. Their version really looks like a winner. Good luck Van’s
Take a look at the Sonex Highwing,
 
I am seriously interested in building a -15. It will 100% fit 99% of our needs and wants. The 1% would be the maybe one flight a year when I’d like to bring two passengers. Looking forward to seeing it at Oshkosh!
 
Definitely made me want to scratch my "I need to build another airplane" itch again.
 
Last edited:
Seems like they may have really engineered the plane well for the backcountry mission. Not sure it still fits my mission though. I think i would like a more cessna 150 mission: smaller, simple , cheap utility. But wider cockpit high wing, large flaps to optimize wing area for high cruise speed so flaps could be used for slower approach speed. But that is just me. Their version really looks like a winner. Good luck Van’s
Interestingly, they also mentioned that they will be targeting flight schools after MOSAIC and optionally adding a nose wheel. That could make this interesting for a lot more people on both ends of the spectrum: those that are just getting started and those that no longer enjoy climbing over a wing to get in. It feels like this will be the start of a whole platform, probably not unlike what Cub Crafters is doing. Since on this one wings and tail cone are derived from the RV-10, maybe the RV-16 could be based on the 12? That would be quite interesting.
 
Back
Top