VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.

  #1  
Old 05-31-2012, 05:00 PM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 781
Default Ground run shroud

I have been planning on starting the break-in on the ground for many years. Now that I have actually experience doing it, I thought I would post this for anyone else thinking the same.

It was fairly simple to build. The hardest part is making the scalloped tabs that bend over and rivet to the top skin. Used the old ECi overhaul crews recommendation of 1 cubic foot of inlet area for each cylinder. The cable in the center I think now is overkill, but didn't want to take any chances. When bolted on it is rock solid.

Did my first break-in ground run this morning, 50 minutes 80% power. The shroud worked well, with the highest CHT htting 330 deg. I need to increase the size of the oil cooler inlet some as the oil max'd out at 250 deg. I used an extra Van's eyeball vent rear end and thought it may be too small, but wasn't sure how much pressure I was going to get.

I know there are those out there who like all the technical data, like me, (no offense Dan ) , but we are trying to get this plane to Oshkosh, so I am sorry there is no time to try and modify my engine plenum press box to take readings. If I have time after Mel has given the plane his OK, may try and get pressure data, because I would like to know. On the other hand there is the old, "it just works" way of thinking.








__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
formerly IO-360A3B6D, Dual SDS CPI now, WW 200RV

Last edited by RV8RIVETER : 05-31-2012 at 05:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-31-2012, 07:04 PM
N427EF N427EF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,565
Default Just curious?

It's quite a set up.
Out of curiosity, what are you hoping to gain from running your engine on the ground?
Your 8 looks like it's ready to fly, why not do the breakin in the air.
I am sure you have a good reason.
__________________
Ernst Freitag
RV-8 finished (sold)
RV-10 IO-540 8.5:1
Running on 91 Octane E10 mogas since 2011
Don't believe everything you know.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2012, 07:25 AM
G3i Ignition's Avatar
G3i Ignition G3i Ignition is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 182
Default

I like it, nice set-up. Extra time spent on options like this are well worth it. Piece of mind as well as safety.
__________________
Thomas Shpakow
http://www.G3ignition.com

Follow G3i on Facebook.
www.facebook.com/pages/G3i-Ignition/243104229291
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2012, 08:07 AM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N427EF View Post
It's quite a set up.
Out of curiosity, what are you hoping to gain from running your engine on the ground?
Your 8 looks like it's ready to fly, why not do the breakin in the air.
I am sure you have a good reason.
Speaking for myself only, we all have our opinions and choices. I do not feel comfortable test flying a new plane AND a new engine, too much going on, cuts the safety margin. Also, my airpark has no good options if the engine quits on take-off, so it is good to know the engine is running well and has been run hard for the most critical part of the break-in. When it flys, we only have to concentrate on how it is flying.
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
formerly IO-360A3B6D, Dual SDS CPI now, WW 200RV
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2012, 11:40 AM
SMO's Avatar
SMO SMO is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salmon Arm, BC
Posts: 933
Default I like it!

The constraints associated with doing a proper engine break in seem to me to be incompatible with flight testing activities, this has been a niggling concern in the back of my mind. I may do the same as you.
__________________
Mark Olson
1987 RV-4 Sold
2003 Super Decathlon - Sold
F1 EVO Rocket, first flight May 31/14
First in line for the Sonex JSX-2T kit
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2012, 08:31 PM
N427EF N427EF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,565
Default All Good reasons!

You mention all good reasons for doing the ground tests.
How many hours are you planning on doing this?
Your concerns have been shared by many others before you, I have just never actually seen anybody do what you are doing.
I suppose if you keep your cylinder temps under control and keep the oil from cooking, your engine will break in just fine.
Hope you make it to Oshkosh, and good luck on your first flight.
__________________
Ernst Freitag
RV-8 finished (sold)
RV-10 IO-540 8.5:1
Running on 91 Octane E10 mogas since 2011
Don't believe everything you know.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-2012, 08:36 PM
jrs14855 jrs14855 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 2,644
Default ground run

The optimum for ground break in is a test club. Any of the engine shops that have test cell would probably discuss the test props.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-02-2012, 08:42 AM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 781
Default

The only reason to have a test club is nobody wants a full size, very expensive, prop in their test cell. I guess another would be known hp, if you have a test club pitched so that you know it takes 180hp or 200hp to make full RPM then you have a poor mans dyno check. Other than that there is no difference.

According the test guru at ECi, they used this method for many years on all of their overhauls until they built their test cell. You can even see a picture in their engine break in pamphlet.
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
formerly IO-360A3B6D, Dual SDS CPI now, WW 200RV
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-02-2012, 09:01 AM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N427EF View Post
How many hours are you planning on doing this?


Your concerns have been shared by many others before you, I have just never actually seen anybody do what you are doing.
The engine is running very well so while I orginally planned to try and get 4 hours, I think I will be happy with one more hour.


Yes, I remember a thread long ago where people said "you can't run it on the ground" and "pay the engine builder to do extra runs" ect.. Some nay sayers out there, some think it is way to complicated. It is not that much time to make, took me 2 days. And it shows, made from scraps and didn't want it pretty, just rigid. Based on my first numbers CHT cooling is better on the ground. The engine doesn't know the difference. The only down side is you had bettter be on good relations with your neighbors.
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
formerly IO-360A3B6D, Dual SDS CPI now, WW 200RV

Last edited by RV8RIVETER : 06-02-2012 at 09:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-03-2012, 11:52 AM
LarryT LarryT is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 426
Default Request for more info...

What engine RPM and MP were you using? Did you sweep the area around the aircraft pretty carefully? I prefer to be moving before I have my prop turning over 1800 RPM because it is quite easy to suck up a rock and ding it.

Your comment re noise got me wondering if this method with a fixed pitch prop would be louder because of higher engine/propeller speed.

Do you have approximate dimensions of your shroud or did you just eyeball it?

Looks like a good idea to me. I won't have many options for forced landings around W52 either (guess I could "drop in unexpectedly" on Jon at Parkside). I can hear the occasional plane take-off from W52 from my house, which is about 1 1/4 miles away. I know our airport owner has had noise complaints from neighbors. I think they are from low level overflights from aircraft making improper departures, but I expect that running at high power for an extended time period would meet with similar objections from the same people.

Larry T
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.