I asked this on the Dynon forum yesterday but my impatience compels me to ask it here as well.
I'm installing a Dynon pitot/AOA in my RV10 and because I don't know much about metallurgy, I have to ask this question about work hardening. The instructions state that the tubing coming out of the pitot is not annealed and will therefore work harden very quickly and so each section of tubing should be bent only once.
Because I put my pitot mount where Van's plans said to put it (one bay inboard of the bell-crank - lesson learned) I have an issue of keeping the tubing from interfering with the push-rod and still having the pitot removeable. After much deliberation and trial and error with scrap tubing I feel I have a good solution. But it requires a more-or-less complex sequence of bends. I did a decent job of it on my actual pitot the first time, but not perfect. It required several small hand adjustments before it was just right to where I can easily get it in and out and keep it secured well away from the push tubes and bell-crank. Essentially I route the tubing forward against the spar and at the same time outboard and upward to emerge in the bell-crank bay above the bell-crank itself (relative to a mounted wing, not a wing upright in the cradle).
I don't know what the implications of work-hardening are here. I'm sure my adjustments moved some parts of the tubing small amounts multiple times. So what are the dangers of these tubes being "work-hardened" and is there a way I can know if I have ruined these tubes?
Here's a picture showing the bends which resemble a sort of cork-screw if you could see it from a couple angles:
I'm installing a Dynon pitot/AOA in my RV10 and because I don't know much about metallurgy, I have to ask this question about work hardening. The instructions state that the tubing coming out of the pitot is not annealed and will therefore work harden very quickly and so each section of tubing should be bent only once.
Because I put my pitot mount where Van's plans said to put it (one bay inboard of the bell-crank - lesson learned) I have an issue of keeping the tubing from interfering with the push-rod and still having the pitot removeable. After much deliberation and trial and error with scrap tubing I feel I have a good solution. But it requires a more-or-less complex sequence of bends. I did a decent job of it on my actual pitot the first time, but not perfect. It required several small hand adjustments before it was just right to where I can easily get it in and out and keep it secured well away from the push tubes and bell-crank. Essentially I route the tubing forward against the spar and at the same time outboard and upward to emerge in the bell-crank bay above the bell-crank itself (relative to a mounted wing, not a wing upright in the cradle).
I don't know what the implications of work-hardening are here. I'm sure my adjustments moved some parts of the tubing small amounts multiple times. So what are the dangers of these tubes being "work-hardened" and is there a way I can know if I have ruined these tubes?
Here's a picture showing the bends which resemble a sort of cork-screw if you could see it from a couple angles:
![2013-04-16_00-34-31_123-1024x768.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fairplane.athomeinthewilburness.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2F2013-04-16_00-34-31_123-1024x768.jpg&hash=0fec70fbf5785c6ffb3da77eaeed1a3a)
Last edited: