Approach often assigns the LOC 34 approach into KSGS, even when you've filed with /G. If you look at the proximity of KSGS with KMSP, there's a bit of congested airspace and when I asked I was told that the localizer approach has fewer conflicts with the RNAV approach. So I get to use the localizer a bit.
I'm somewhat ambivalent about the underlying nav tech - GPS is nicer for sure, but I feel like there are fewer failure modes with the older tech. I've had GPS integrity errors on an approach, for example, but haven't lost a localizer or glideslope during that phase of flight (admittedly, it's possible).
I flew from KTRL to KPEA, 3.2hrs IMC (hand flown - I enjoy it more than the AP) and found the VOR provided more boredom relief by using it as a way to validate the GPS-supplied position. It's a great backup, but not my primary long range nav.