Make sure to understand *all* the differences
Ryan,
Even the relatively low-end "glass" products are superior to "steam gauges" in most respects, including cost, weight, and simplicity of installation. Another major advantage of glass is the way data is presented, which if properly trained, can reduce the pilot's mental workload. EFIS systems are also generally far more reliable than steam gauges (no moving parts, no vacuum system).
However, they are electrically dependent. And also otherwise, like any other device, EFIS systems can malfunction. They have their own vulnerabilities and failure modes, but which are different than those that affect steam gauges. You must understand these vulnerabilities and failure modes, and design your overall system -- avionics package, electrical system, etc. -- to deal with them. Especially for an IFR airplane. For example, what backup instruments will you need in case your primary EFIS fails completely, i.e. your screen goes black while you're in IMC? A limited set of backup steam gauges? Or a second independent EFIS? How about an independent power source?
The vulnerabilities and failure modes will also vary from one EFIS product to another. You should understand these differences before selecting which EFIS unit(s) to install in your airplane. For example, the Dynon instruments have been known to have a particular vulnerability to pitot-static errors which can cause major corruption of the attitude solution. In other words, if you get a blocked pitot or static port with a Dynon, you will get inaccurate readings on your pressure instruments as well as attitude. A much worse situation than the classic "partial panel" scenarios that you are now training on. Now, I'm not trying to pick on Dynon. All these different vendors and products out there have their strengths and weaknesses. These are mostly not so critical for a VFR airplane, but can be absolutely vital for IFR.
I hope I'm not discouraging you away from glass. I personally believe that the benefits of glass far exceed the weaknesses, so long as the weaknesses are appropriately dealt with in the overall system design. I'm just trying to point out, by example, that you should do your homework and take these types of considerations seriously in making your choices.