I am building a RV10 in the UK. Our airworthiness requirements normally require at least one conventional magneto - I know, it's mediaeval but there it goes ![Mad :mad: :mad:]()
However, the LAA has approved at least one dual PMag installation on the grounds of equivalence. With the imminent (?) release of the P200 for 6 cylinder Lycoming, I intend to put forward a case for dual installation on my -10.
As far as I am aware, there has not been a single case of a double PMag failure leading to a forced landing. Confirmation, please?
However, the LAA has approved at least one dual PMag installation on the grounds of equivalence. With the imminent (?) release of the P200 for 6 cylinder Lycoming, I intend to put forward a case for dual installation on my -10.
As far as I am aware, there has not been a single case of a double PMag failure leading to a forced landing. Confirmation, please?