Maybe this has come up before on the -7/-9 , but I couldn't find a post on it...
I'm slightly past rolling over my -7 fuselage, and did a dry fit of the F-789 elevator pusrod (joystick to bellcrank). To my surprise I couldn't feed the control rod into position (going from aft to fwd or fwd to aft)! I checked the instructions and could not find reference to installing the rod, and I have trouble believing Vans would have one install this during the aft/center section mating (thereby trapping it). Further, if the F-706 bulkhead had a slightly enlarged pass through (on top side of retangle) it looks like it might go through. Anyone have a similar issue? I have the stong feeling that Van's didn't do a good installation check on this during the design (a 3D removal check). To me it was natural not to install the rod during the mate, to keep it out of the way while bucking rivets.
I'm an Aero engineer specializing in structures, so I'd appreciate any comments starting out from the standpoint that NORMAL aircraft design practices are to not trap control systems if possible (and it could have been possible). If I missed the step where this rod should have been installed during the aft/center section mating, then please point where it is called out in the instructions (which would then **** me off that Van's would trap it that way). And no my fuselage doesn't have an abnormal concave situation.
As it is it looks like I'll need to do some slight die grinding work on the F-706 pass-through...
I'm slightly past rolling over my -7 fuselage, and did a dry fit of the F-789 elevator pusrod (joystick to bellcrank). To my surprise I couldn't feed the control rod into position (going from aft to fwd or fwd to aft)! I checked the instructions and could not find reference to installing the rod, and I have trouble believing Vans would have one install this during the aft/center section mating (thereby trapping it). Further, if the F-706 bulkhead had a slightly enlarged pass through (on top side of retangle) it looks like it might go through. Anyone have a similar issue? I have the stong feeling that Van's didn't do a good installation check on this during the design (a 3D removal check). To me it was natural not to install the rod during the mate, to keep it out of the way while bucking rivets.
I'm an Aero engineer specializing in structures, so I'd appreciate any comments starting out from the standpoint that NORMAL aircraft design practices are to not trap control systems if possible (and it could have been possible). If I missed the step where this rod should have been installed during the aft/center section mating, then please point where it is called out in the instructions (which would then **** me off that Van's would trap it that way). And no my fuselage doesn't have an abnormal concave situation.
As it is it looks like I'll need to do some slight die grinding work on the F-706 pass-through...