mlw450802
Well Known Member
While I have heard nothing but raves about this dimpler, I have a question about the "crispness" of the dimples produced by it. I often see comments along the lines of: "a squeezer doesn't make as sharp a dimple as the one from a C-Frame".
It seems to me the DRDT2 is simply a squeezer with a deep throat for reaching the holes in wing skins etc.
Does it in fact make better dimples that the C-frame types or are the benefits of quietness and ease of use the primary drivers here?
Would All (any of) you DRDT2 drivers out there please chime in on dimple quality?
Please compare it (in your experience) with a dimple from a pneumatic squeezer and a dimple from a C-frame.
Thinking of going that way but wondering if it's worth the money since I already have the other dimpling mechanisms.
-Thanks,
Mike
It seems to me the DRDT2 is simply a squeezer with a deep throat for reaching the holes in wing skins etc.
Does it in fact make better dimples that the C-frame types or are the benefits of quietness and ease of use the primary drivers here?
Would All (any of) you DRDT2 drivers out there please chime in on dimple quality?
Please compare it (in your experience) with a dimple from a pneumatic squeezer and a dimple from a C-frame.
Thinking of going that way but wondering if it's worth the money since I already have the other dimpling mechanisms.
-Thanks,
Mike
Last edited: