Dang, Gil! I spent hours looking though Digikey, Spark Fun, etc. and only found the normal bulkhead connectors. Those would be not only beautiful but more fireproof.
As for the passthough with grommet, I have already had to replace the firewall on my -6A and the struggle to get terminals and such through convinced me there had to be a better way. Also, I don't feel the grommets and shields are enough protection. As a result, the -10 will have firewall-rated CPCs for the sensors and bulkhead connectors for the power cables. The Lightspeed Ignition cables were the last problem to solve and I found some isolated bulkhead connectors that would do the job. I may yet change to the ones Gil found, though.
You will be able to disconnect the engine completely from the firewall without disturbing its integrity. Or, as I had to do, you will be able to remove the firewall without struggling to thread stuff through too-large holes or, at worst, cutting wires.
Update: I went to the Canare site and found some documentation on their bulkhead connector. It's really just a normal connector with an isolation ring in a flush mount 'tub'. Unfortunately, the isolation ring is ABS and the 'tub' is nickel-AL. The connectors I found earlier (I don't have the part number or mfg handy) are the brass-nickel plated steel, like the Canare connector, but the isolation ring is teflon. Still not as firewall-safe as I'd like, but the connector can be oriented so the isolator has minimal exposure on the hot side of the firewall and then protected with firewall putty, to the point where it won't be any worse than the aluminum rivets burning through. I'd like some opinions on that nickel-AL tub from Canare, though, because I could always swap their connector and ring with the ones I have now and the installation would be easier (or cheaper, anyway, if I don't have to buy that punch). But right now, I'm leaning toward buying the tool and going with what I have.
