Well,
That's why I was sure to make it clear what I meant by short soft fields. No offense roberta, but you fly off an airpark.
Fin, you fly a 9, with a much lower landing speed, and hence much less of a need for touchdown/braking that the poster's 7.
Benson, the airfield I used as an example, is on the chart for the twin cities, give it a shot, report back....I would not recomend you take a nose gear RV in there, but if you want an idea of what I was describing...there it is.
The second field I used as an example is only mildly rough and obstructed, but the vast majority of nosegear rv drivers I know won't land there...I imagaine that such is a reflection of their good judgement rather than their lack of skill.
Sorry, but the poster asked about the kind of strips requiring bush wheels. I am assuming he means a field with a steep short approach and soft/rough surface, not a groomed strip with a flat approach.
Do you disagree that:
1. Although pilot techniques can be a fator, there are grass strips for which a nose gear rv is an improper craft.
2. Adding bushwheels to the mains alone would alter the gear geometry adding weight to the nose and exacerbating the current issues.
3. Adding a large nose wheel probably is a poor design fit for the rest of the nose gear structure.
I certainly can't imagine why you would argue with the premise that, if one is going to outfit an RV with bush wheels, perhaps a taildragger is a better candidate for those operations.
If you had a rough strip and a choice between a TD with six inch tires or a NG with six inch mains and a 5 inch nosegear (one size up on both), which would you choose?