Gents-
I am an A&P working on an RV-6 annual for a customer. He has a Hartzell HC-C2YK-1BF propeller on a Lycoming O-360 AIA.
A 100 hour repetative AD (2009-22-03 which superseeded 2006-18-15) requiring an eddy current of the front half of the blade hub is applicable. It has been over 200 hours since an eddy current was performed (owner was curious and chose to conduct this once.)
The owner does not conduct aerobatics. He tells me that everbody who performs normal flight disregards this AD and that since he does not conduct aerobatics, it is not really applicable to this propeller.
Is this a community norm? I was just curious if anyone else has heard of this.
My gut feeling is that this AD is required and the owner will need to get the AD C/W prior to signing the propellor off for an annual.
Thanks in advance!
I am an A&P working on an RV-6 annual for a customer. He has a Hartzell HC-C2YK-1BF propeller on a Lycoming O-360 AIA.
A 100 hour repetative AD (2009-22-03 which superseeded 2006-18-15) requiring an eddy current of the front half of the blade hub is applicable. It has been over 200 hours since an eddy current was performed (owner was curious and chose to conduct this once.)
The owner does not conduct aerobatics. He tells me that everbody who performs normal flight disregards this AD and that since he does not conduct aerobatics, it is not really applicable to this propeller.
Is this a community norm? I was just curious if anyone else has heard of this.
My gut feeling is that this AD is required and the owner will need to get the AD C/W prior to signing the propellor off for an annual.
Thanks in advance!