VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.

  #1  
Old 03-18-2012, 07:53 PM
tcard's Avatar
tcard tcard is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 321
Default Sunday Service

Scott left me for two days and flew 10+ hours to help ferry the RV-1 to Alabama and return Roy to Hicks. He even managed to get some actual IFR time. None of that is even remotely fair, so Sunday was my day. It was looking to be a good day to practice two skills - an actual IMC IFR approach and crosswind landings.

We headed to the airport with winds 12 gusting to 18 right down the primary runway and a 1300 foot ceiling, thinking it would be a quiet morning for the tower. After filling up the tank since the last fuel load came from Louisiana, we waited several minutes at the hold short line for a Cherokee that had the same IFR practice plan that we did. We asked for the west initial approach point on the t-section, and were given the appropriate frequency. We were given takeoff clearance with an easterly heading - OK, no problem - other side of the t-section. As we rolled onto the runway, we were given a different departure frequency. Ah, hey guys, a bad time for that!

OK, we're off and in the clouds when we get "Two Two Charlie, please slow down to 150." There were two very confused pilots in the cockpit looking at each other with bewilderment. "Austin departure, Two Two Charlie is doing 135." A minute later, it finally dawns on us, the controller meant GROUND SPEED. So, we clarified with approach they meant ground speed, and I pulled the power back to put the ground speed around 150, but we had apparently closed the gap on the Cherokee too close for the controller's comfort. A few more vectors, and we were back on track and shortly on the runway. Pretty sure we had a green controller today.

Ground Speed - 174, with a 40 knot tailwind


Scott confirmed our IFR was cancelled and the tower confirmed we were squawking 1200. Check and check. Actual IMC accomplished, now let's attack some crosswind landings. The winds had increased winds 14 gusting to 20 from 160, so we asked the tower for laps on runway 11. By now, the tower is used to oddball requests coming out of our cockpit so they didn't miss a beat. It just isn't any fun to always use the runway most aligned with the skills. That is also a recipe for skills to atrophy. Neither of which is allowed in our household.

The tower had a pretty steady stream of traffic coming in on the GPS approach we had just completed, so they kept us on the south side of runway 11. That worked great for us as we had a 30 knot tailwind on base, causing a lot of work to not overshoot the runway and a few discussions on stall spins on the base to final leg. They swung us around to the north side just once to put us over the top of an IFR flyer that was terminating with a low approach. They managed us crazy fools quite well.

If we had been in west Texas, I'm sure there would have been tumbleweeds cruising across the runway at 60 knots. It was certainly time to snug down the seatbelts, or the tops of our heads might have gotten very cozy with the canopy on several occassions. The runway is also lined with trees not nearly far enough away. Each time we'd hit the boundary from the tree layer to ground effect, it was common to see airspeed go up to 80 knots and then drop to 65 in no more than a second. Too bad we didn't have some wind tunnel fog - I bet we would have seen some impressive rotors coming off those trees.

As we continued to go in circles and trade landings, the tower got in on the fun and began reporting wind speeds on the ground and at the top of the tower. The tower cab is about 80 feet up and had winds regulary blowing 30 knots. I think they were having a good time, too. Scott is still much better at this, although his landings weren't the usual squeakers. I was pretty pleased I managed to get wheels down twice and no metal bent at any point. It's good to keep improving the skills and know I can get the plane down in sporty conditions even if the go-around button is utilized a couple times in the process. We managed 11 laps on runway 11. Certainly wasn't planned, but it's pretty amusing in hind sight. Skill check 2 - complete.

11 on 11


1.2 on the Hobbs felt like 3+. It was quite a workout. As we taxied back to the hangar, the controller asked us if we had pegged the fun meter. Yep - you betcha!
__________________
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
The other half of a flying RV-9A and an 8 in the shop.

Last edited by tcard : 03-18-2012 at 07:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2012, 07:56 PM
DarylT's Avatar
DarylT DarylT is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 453
Default Fair....

None of that is even remotely fair!!!

Scott... you need to put the hammer down and get the 8 completed. I can not believe Tanya even said that!!!

They don't call me the Pot Stirer for nothing!
__________________
Daryl Tolliver
VAF 1086
Yes: I paid my =VAF= membership dues for 2021
RV-7A - N754RV: Status - Pink Slip is In! First Flight 8/23/12 - My First Flight 9/24/12!

Home from GloCustom for Paint! 3/16/13
1046 hours and climbing

9th Condition Inspection complete 10/31/2021

Superior XP IO360 (180 HP), Hartzell Blended Airfoil, AF-5400 EFIS panel, Garmin Aera 660, TruTrak Vizion 385 AutoPilot, Dual Pmags
Houston, TX

Dry Creek Airpark (TS07)
http://www.rv7a-factory.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2012, 08:17 PM
scard's Avatar
scard scard is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarylT View Post
None of that is even remotely fair!!!

Scott... you need to put the hammer down and get the 8 completed. I can not believe Tanya even said that!!!

They don't call me the Pot Stirer for nothing!
It took me a few days to process our visit with Dan. I'm just now getting my desk cleared of old Statics, Dynamics, Fluid dynamics, and Calculus text to more fully consider some of his comments . After our little exercise today, I got about 5hrs of shop time doing glass layups on the canopy, while Tanya went to the grocery store and did laundry!! All is right in the world, even though I feel just a little bit guilty. The -8 is going to be great fun on the wing of the -9. We're calling it a "light twin".
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
VAF Advertiser
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-19-2012, 10:06 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scard View Post
....... I got about 5hrs of shop time doing glass layups on the canopy, while Tanya went to the grocery store and did laundry!! All is right in the world, even though I feel just a little bit guilty.

Hey Scott, I got back from a week of overseas travel, and found most of our "pre-paint-shop" fiberglas touch-up work done on the -3....forget sending Tanya to the grocery and laundry - get her to do the glass work like Louise!
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.