That looks really, really cool!! But assuming the right side looks like the left, how would one change the wheel when it got worn?
That looks really, really cool!! But assuming the right side looks like the left, how would one change the wheel when it got worn?
Oh that's just cool, one advantage if it matters would be a larger bearing surface area...
The larger bearing size has a much greater load rating; if you biff a landing it will survive the impact. Skidding occurs when the longitudinal axis is not align with the direction of flight. ( use the rudder pedals). as for weight it came within a few grams of the original...which would be an advantage if the standard setups are inadequate, but clearly, they are not. The large race diameter increases roller speed, the chance of skidding, and weight.
The design goal was to make me happy...Airplanes are requirements based, what are the design goals of this configuration?
Re-invent the tail wheel maybe, different yes, the one feature I am looking forward to using is to be able to run a tie down chain thru the middle and not scratch the tail wheel fork,......if this is simply an attempt to be different, fine, but if you are trying to "reinvent the wheel", some of us would like to understand the thought process.
However, "skidding" in this context, is the balls in the race. By increasing the race diameter, you are making the balls travel further for the same RPM, increasing their speed. The goal with bearings and bushings is to decrease the surface speed. This is why bearings at the center of a hub is so efficient.
why do I feel like your airplane is part of a prison chain gang with that tie down
why do I feel like your airplane is part of a prison chain gang with that tie down