Performance update
I got into the air this afternoon for about an hour. Top speed at 8500 DA was ~195 mph TAS (varied a bit from 193-197), and 2680-2690 RPM. This was WOT and was NOT a scientific study, just what I observed on the gauge. Went down to 5500 DA and saw virtually the same numbers. Once I put on the upper intersection fairings (left them off for a couple reasons and have about 3" of exposed gear leg) I might pick up a bit more. So about the same speed as with the Sensenich, but at slightly lower RPM (I was seeing right on 200 mph at 2750 rpm with the Sensenich during my original testing). MUCH smoother running with the new prop.
I did one climb test from about 4500 to 8500 feet and was seeing ~1400 fpm on average (it bounced around quite a bit) at Vy (~92 mph in my airplane). This is behind the power curve, running about 2200-2250 rpm (I didn't make note of the exact rpm). Subjective feeling is that the airplane cruise climbs better than with the Sensenich by a bit, if I keep it above ~2400 rpm.
Takeoff performance was similar to the Sensenich, though I got off the ground a bit quicker. Again, perhaps because of being behind the power curve taking off at 6000 DA. Doing TnGs, it definitely accelerated faster than the Sensenich, since I was starting at ~40 mph rather than from a standstill.
The biggest surprise to me was the landings. I have never had an issue with landing the RV in a reasonable amount of runway, but now I understand what people say about the 9 floating forever. It seemed to me that it was difficult to get it to go down with this new prop. Maybe different braking tendencies with the Catto/3-blade vs. aluminum 2-blade? I have to temper this remark with the fact that I have also been playing with my idle settings, and it may have been idling a bit higher than normal, thus possibly lengthening my glide on final. I'll be doing additional testing on this tomorrow.
Cheers,
Greg