VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
w/a Donation






VAF on Twitter:
@VansAirForceNet

  #11  
Old 02-05-2023, 10:13 AM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 6,176
Default

Try TAM Graphics in San Angelo TX, owner Byron Kypfer, 325-277-6663, bkypfer@suddenlink.net

https://www.tamgangelo.com/?fbclid=I...W4fsjb3_NXEH_o

He has a full graphics shop and laser engraver, he engraved my fuel caps and has 20+ years experience cutting graphics for aircraft.
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2023 dues paid
N16GN flying 1,250 hrs and counting on 93E10; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, IFD440, G5
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.
Repeat Offender - 10 empennage in process, engine core purchased

Last edited by airguy : 02-05-2023 at 10:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-05-2023, 10:26 AM
erich weaver's Avatar
erich weaver erich weaver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCool View Post
No STC needed for G100UL, nor any other fuel for experiment airplanes. In fact… STCs aren’t needed for anything in experimental aviation.
I hear ya, but have a hard time believing GAMI is just going to let all experimentals slide with no payment. The STC cost is how GAMI is recouping some of their development cost. One of the comments on the recent AVWEB article indicates FAA is requiring a list of all aircraft approved for the G100 fuel. I would assume that fuel will not be dispensed to an unapproved plane. Exactly how that would be implemented, I’m unsure, but seems like it could be done relatively easily.
__________________
Erich
RV-7A
Santa Ynez, CA
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-05-2023, 01:20 PM
MacCool's Avatar
MacCool MacCool is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: central Minnesota
Posts: 1,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by erich weaver View Post
I hear ya, but have a hard time believing GAMI is just going to let all experimentals slide with no payment. The STC cost is how GAMI is recouping some of their development cost. One of the comments on the recent AVWEB article indicates FAA is requiring a list of all aircraft approved for the G100 fuel. I would assume that fuel will not be dispensed to an unapproved plane. Exactly how that would be implemented, I’m unsure, but seems like it could be done relatively easily.
I’m confident that all GA piston-engine aircraft using G100UL will pay a premium at the pump that will include refining/blending, distribution, and development costs…certified and Experimental alike. A lot of that cost is for the STC itself and I’m inclined to doubt that GAMI will make us pay for that since we don’t need it. The rest of it…yeah, we’ll take it in the shorts for awhile as the blending and distribution pipeline ramps up.
__________________
RV-9A, 2011, bought flying
IO-320D1A (factory new), C/S
Dual Pmags
IFR equipped
AFS 5400/3500, G5, IFD440 navigator,
bunch of other stuff
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-05-2023, 02:23 PM
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 10,139
Default

Opinions are just that, until someone knows what GAMI is planning.

Why doesn't someone that hopes to use the fuel in an experimental, just call them up and ask?
__________________
Opinions, information, and comments, are my own unless stated otherwise.
You are personally responsible for determining the suitability of any tips, ideas, etc. obtained from any post I have made in this forum.


Scott McDaniels
Hubbard, Oregon
Formerly of Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop
FAA/DAR, A&P, EAA Technical Councelor
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-05-2023, 02:38 PM
dmattmul's Avatar
dmattmul dmattmul is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 644
Default The data plate on my O-360 A1A says, "Min octane 91/96".

Most Lycoming manuals state this. Why 2 min's RON and MON issue?
__________________
RV-14A QB builds (2017), Lycoming 390 Thunderbolt arrived July 2019, Garmin avionics, Vertical Power, EFII-32 Ignition and Fuel, Whirlwind 300-72, Earth-X batteries, Beringer wheels and brakes, Parts became real airplane 8/15/2020. Started RV-10 Nov 2020. Empennage arrived (Built) Working on QB kits. Garmin avionics, Vertical Power, EFII-32 Ignition and Fuel, Whirlwind 3 blade HRT 378, Earth-X batteries, Beringer wheels and brakes, real airplane hopefully early-mid 2024. Paid subscriber
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-06-2023, 03:43 PM
erich weaver's Avatar
erich weaver erich weaver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 View Post
Why doesn't someone that hopes to use the fuel in an experimental, just call them up and ask?
I emailed GAMI yesterday about this. Here is their reply:

“Experimentals do not need an STC to use the fuel. Like any other STC’d product, you can just put it on. However, we would be happy to sell you fuel filler placards if you wanted them. “
Thanks,
Paul Smith

Cool. Another reason I’m glad I own an experimental. Now Just waiting for some G100UL to be available.
__________________
Erich
RV-7A
Santa Ynez, CA
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-06-2023, 05:01 PM
MacCool's Avatar
MacCool MacCool is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: central Minnesota
Posts: 1,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by erich weaver View Post
I emailed GAMI yesterday about this. Here is their reply:

“Experimentals do not need an STC to use the fuel. Like any other STC’d product, you can just put it on. However, we would be happy to sell you fuel filler placards if you wanted them. “
Thanks,
Paul Smith

Cool. Another reason I’m glad I own an experimental. Now Just waiting for some G100UL to be available.
Here are those placards as described in the GAMI's addition to the to the POH.

I read somewhere on their website that they're guessing 2023 will be logistics and ramp-up in 2024. AvFuel is managing distribution. It will be interesting to see at what rate G100UL trickles out to the small rural airports.

..
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	placards.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	418.7 KB
ID:	37981  
__________________
RV-9A, 2011, bought flying
IO-320D1A (factory new), C/S
Dual Pmags
IFR equipped
AFS 5400/3500, G5, IFD440 navigator,
bunch of other stuff
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-07-2023, 05:29 AM
Amadeus's Avatar
Amadeus Amadeus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Basalt, CO/Lexington, KY
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCool View Post
It will be interesting to see at what rate G100UL trickles out to the small rural airports.
At every airport I land I inquire about their plan and timeline to comply with the EAGLE Initiative and begin offering an unleaded option and whether they are leaning toward GAMI G100UL, Swift UL94 or mogas. Other than only one airport manager they all looked at me as if I had lobsters crawling out of my ears. Totally unaware of the governmental plans to eliminate leaded fuels in aviation.

A few even laughed it off telling me they provide 100LL and they will always only provide 100LL (two even added that I should've purchased a "real" airplane).
__________________
Jayson
RV-12iS
E-LSA
Donated
“Never feel sorry for a man who owns a plane.” -Charles Morse (Anthony Hopkins) Movie - "The Edge" https://youtu.be/dJD0lB4zRes
"...except during the month of Annual Condition Inspection." -Me (in the hangar)
"My first wife didn't like airplanes." - Gordon Baxter

Last edited by Amadeus : 02-07-2023 at 05:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-07-2023, 05:35 AM
Bob Y Bob Y is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Piedmont, SC
Posts: 470
Default

At the airport where I landed yesterday they didn’t know what MOGAS was either!
__________________
Bob Y - builder 12iS
N569TT first flight 2/9/2020
#121047
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-07-2023, 05:59 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 11,693
Default PEOPLE, PEOPLE, PEOPLE..........

Why are all you people insistent on adding non-required information on your filler cap placards? The regulations call for "Minimum Octane and Capacity"; Nothing more.

Regulations do NOT call for "lead content" or anything else.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century. Over 1,000 certifications accomplished. Discount for Veterans, Law Enforcement, Fire Fighters.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1, Lifetime EAA.
Recipient of EAA Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>

Last edited by Mel : 02-07-2023 at 06:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.