...Only shown to make a point, not a literal example. The point remains that skill plays a HUGE role in the outcome of an event where the primary variable is skill. Flying under an overpass is skill based activity - so is formation, landing a taildragger in a crosswind, and making the base-final turn, etc, etc.
I think improving piloting skills is a very important aspect and so is improving decision making but in this instance about stall spin at low altitudes, skill has very little to do with surviving the initial error. At 300 feet if you are not expecting to flick in, you don't have a hope of saving the situation no matter what your skill level (unless you are actually Sean Tucker).
Recognizing first that trying to pull 2 Gs at 60 knots while tightening up the base to final turn defies the physical limits of the airplane to remain in controlled flight will save you every time in the first place. The military and airlines train with rigid procedures to avoid problems in the first place. It does not work every time but their accident rates prove that the theory works in real life.
It is more logical to avoid rather than react and the outcome is a lot more predictable.
If you are just landing the airplane, do you have to make it more exciting somehow? I'll save my excitement for some stiff/ gusty crosswind landings, formation flying or a tail chase up high somewhere.