I saw this in a comment attributed to Ken Krueger in the RV-10 topics::
“Given that spins are not recommended in either RV-10 or RV-14 and that both aircraft have such benign stall characteristics, the increased moment of inertia due to ER fuel was deemed an acceptable compromise.”
The RV-10 is not aerobatic, but the RV-14 is. This is the first time I have seen something that would indicate spins are not “recommended” in an RV-14. Is this true?
“Given that spins are not recommended in either RV-10 or RV-14 and that both aircraft have such benign stall characteristics, the increased moment of inertia due to ER fuel was deemed an acceptable compromise.”
The RV-10 is not aerobatic, but the RV-14 is. This is the first time I have seen something that would indicate spins are not “recommended” in an RV-14. Is this true?