nzrv8
Well Known Member
Hi All,
I built my HS a few years ago now, but I was never happy with the final product - I used a home made DRDT dimpler to dimple the skins, and the dimples were not as crisp as they could have been due to flex in the home-made frame. Probably not a big deal structurally, but it was always on my mind. So it has been hanging on the wall of my shop for years waiting for me to get around to drilling the skins off and fitting new ones with crisp dimples.
Due the fuselage now being ready for a HS, I could avoid it no longer!
Yesterday my sisters partner, a helicopter airframe tech, dropped by and asked if he could help with anything.. Sure I said. There is the drill, there is the HS, get drilling!
The skins came off with no problems - He's done this a few times it seems! But as I was measuring the holes afterwards in the understructure, it turns out that the holes in the ribs are slightly oversize - .106 to .110.
But most of the holes in the slightly thicker spars are within spec's for 3/32 rivets at .103 or less.
The holes weren't affected by the drilling out process (most still had primer in them) so it seems they must have been slightly oversized by the original dimpling process. I was using tank dimple dies back then for understructures, but I don't use them now.
My question - would you live with the slightly oversized holes on the ribs, or would you scrap the parts and start again? I have the edge distance in most areas to go up to 1/8 rivets if required, but I do find these harder to drive in difficult areas - Meaning a higher chance of a riveting mistake.
On the other hand - I know spec's are there for a reason! And building a new HS is not a large undertaking, but the parts are expensive to ship to the bottom of the world. Money aside - I do enjoy this sort of 'repair' work, its always nice to fix something rather than buying all new parts.
Any opinions will be gratefully received!
I built my HS a few years ago now, but I was never happy with the final product - I used a home made DRDT dimpler to dimple the skins, and the dimples were not as crisp as they could have been due to flex in the home-made frame. Probably not a big deal structurally, but it was always on my mind. So it has been hanging on the wall of my shop for years waiting for me to get around to drilling the skins off and fitting new ones with crisp dimples.
Due the fuselage now being ready for a HS, I could avoid it no longer!
Yesterday my sisters partner, a helicopter airframe tech, dropped by and asked if he could help with anything.. Sure I said. There is the drill, there is the HS, get drilling!
The skins came off with no problems - He's done this a few times it seems! But as I was measuring the holes afterwards in the understructure, it turns out that the holes in the ribs are slightly oversize - .106 to .110.
But most of the holes in the slightly thicker spars are within spec's for 3/32 rivets at .103 or less.
The holes weren't affected by the drilling out process (most still had primer in them) so it seems they must have been slightly oversized by the original dimpling process. I was using tank dimple dies back then for understructures, but I don't use them now.
My question - would you live with the slightly oversized holes on the ribs, or would you scrap the parts and start again? I have the edge distance in most areas to go up to 1/8 rivets if required, but I do find these harder to drive in difficult areas - Meaning a higher chance of a riveting mistake.
On the other hand - I know spec's are there for a reason! And building a new HS is not a large undertaking, but the parts are expensive to ship to the bottom of the world. Money aside - I do enjoy this sort of 'repair' work, its always nice to fix something rather than buying all new parts.
Any opinions will be gratefully received!