Anyone have experience with the GT-50? The Aircraft Spruce add leads me to believe the readout is only for min/max and not a continuous reading as one would want during aerobatics? I can't believe this is true but the add says nothing about a continuous readout??
Anyone have a recommendation on a mechanical/analog/needle type as I feel this would be more user friendly at a glance as stated above??
Maybe I'll just get a fish scale and hang it from the glareshield with a 1 lb weight!!!
![Big grin :D :D]()
I don't plan on a lot of negetive G's anyway. Or get 2 fish scales and place the 1 lb weight between them so they can play tug-o-war and presto, +/- readout for under 10 bucks!! Find a way to damp the movement and it'd be great as long as the weight doesn't come free and start bouncing around! hehe.
I've been considering the GT-50 for my RV-6 because I like the additional features of V-meter, clock, and automatic flight timer (which I really like since I don't have a Hobbs and keep forgeting to turn on my West Bend timer at start up). I also like the fact that it only weighs 2.5 ounces. Was just looking at the Flight Data Systems website and from reading the customer testimonials I was given the impression that the G readout is continuous readout and pretty easy to interpret G loading trends, though reading the manual leaves one with the impression that it only shows max. positive/negative load.
____________________________
Customer testimonial:
Sat, 31 Mar 2007
Flight Data Systems GT-50 tested
I have been testing the new Flight Systems GT-50 in my SU-26. As mentioned earlier this year, this is an extremely light weight G-meter with voltmeter, clock, and timer functions. The 2 1/4 " display is highly visible in direct sunlight. The size and crystal clarity of the display allows the pilot's eyes to effortlessly pass over the G-meter during a pull, taking a snapshot of momentary G-load. Try that with a mechanical G-meter! G sensitivity and accuracy are within 1% of my Russian G-meter. Commands are intuitive. I was able to eliminate my original voltmeter, a clock, and one of two other G-meters at a savings of almost 2 pounds. The GT-50 has proven to be rugged, surviving a drop on the floor before installation by a ham handed A & P.
All steady positive and negative changes of pitch demonstrated identical G readings with the Russian accelerometer. Multiple snap rolls at around a 9+ G load gave a .1 G difference between technologies. I could not tell which one was correct, but the agreement is well within any desired limits. I suspect that mechanical G meters are somewhat distorted by rotational G loads contributing to the momentum of the mechanical arms. Snapping to right gave .1 G more. Snapping to left gave .1 G less than the GT-50. Solid state G sensors also have an update of 4 times /sec.
Selling for less than $200, I have not seen anything this impressive in a long time.
Rick Volker
_____________________________
Looks pretty easy to read if you ask me, then again, I flew a Maule for eight years with a vernier throttle and got to where I really liked it, especially off airport, so YMMV.