Auburntsts
Well Known Member
So I'm engaged in a debate over op lims over on AOPA. The catalyst argument was flight into known icing (FIKI) for E-AB certified aircraft. For type certified aircraft this is governed by 14 CFR Part 23.1419. My argument is that an E-AB would have to have in its op lims that FIKI was authorized if properly equipped based upon the following:
Part 91.319 Aircraft having experimental certificates: Operating limitations
(d) Each person operating an aircraft that has an experimental certificate shall?
(2) Operate under VFR, day only, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Administrator
and
FAA Order 8130.2F Para. 153. (a) Operating limitations must be designed to fit the specific situation encountered. The ASI may impose any additional limitations deemed necessary in the interest of safety. The ASI and/or designee must review each imposed operating limitation with the applicant to ensure that the operating limitations are understood by the applicant.
My logic is based upon what the standard op lims state regarding night and IFR flight unless properly equipped. Is my argument valid or am I in for a huge helping of crow?
Part 91.319 Aircraft having experimental certificates: Operating limitations
(d) Each person operating an aircraft that has an experimental certificate shall?
(2) Operate under VFR, day only, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Administrator
and
FAA Order 8130.2F Para. 153. (a) Operating limitations must be designed to fit the specific situation encountered. The ASI may impose any additional limitations deemed necessary in the interest of safety. The ASI and/or designee must review each imposed operating limitation with the applicant to ensure that the operating limitations are understood by the applicant.
My logic is based upon what the standard op lims state regarding night and IFR flight unless properly equipped. Is my argument valid or am I in for a huge helping of crow?