douglassmt
Well Known Member
I have been evaluating whether to use LEDs or traditional position/strobe lights on my RV-10. At first I thought the cost difference between LEDs and traditional nav/pos/strobes was much greater. However, as I looked into it, I realized that the costs are pretty close. Two mistakes I made in my initial evaluation might be made by others. I assumed (incorrectly) that the $95 wingtip landing lights sold by Van's included the wingtip pos/strobe lights because both are in all the pictures on the Van's website and catalog - it is a bit deceiving, though I'm sure not intentional. I also neglected to include the cost (and weight) of the strobe power supply. So, this is how the two options priced out for me, using pricing on Van's website for AeroLEDs products:
Traditionals lights/strobes
Wingtip nav/pos/strobes: 2 each A650-PG-14 = $338
Power supply for three strobes= $390
Tail Position/strobe (LN A500-14) = $144
Total = $872
Aero Leds
Suntail = $340
NS90 = $760/pair
Total = $1100
Difference = $228
This does not include or consider the higher cost and hassle and weight of strobe wiring or the increased reliability of the LEDs or the possibility of RF interference with the longer runs of strobe wires needed with the traditional system. It also assumes the LEDs are as bright or brighter than the traditional lights, which I cannot verify personally but have heard/read anecdotally they are very close.
In my view, for a difference of $228 there is no reason not to use the LEDs. My initial error in the evaluation is probably due to me being new at this, but others may be in the same boat. Thought I'd post it for general consumption.
Traditionals lights/strobes
Wingtip nav/pos/strobes: 2 each A650-PG-14 = $338
Power supply for three strobes= $390
Tail Position/strobe (LN A500-14) = $144
Total = $872
Aero Leds
Suntail = $340
NS90 = $760/pair
Total = $1100
Difference = $228
This does not include or consider the higher cost and hassle and weight of strobe wiring or the increased reliability of the LEDs or the possibility of RF interference with the longer runs of strobe wires needed with the traditional system. It also assumes the LEDs are as bright or brighter than the traditional lights, which I cannot verify personally but have heard/read anecdotally they are very close.
In my view, for a difference of $228 there is no reason not to use the LEDs. My initial error in the evaluation is probably due to me being new at this, but others may be in the same boat. Thought I'd post it for general consumption.