I'd wait for the first hand account before I would want to speculate...grover said:a co-worker retailed a story about an acquaintance whose homeowner's policy was revoked (if that is the correct word) when the agent found he (the homeowner) had an RV project on the premises. What's going on there?
grover said:a co-worker retailed a story about an acquaintance whose homeowner's policy was revoked (if that is the correct word) when the agent found he (the homeowner) had an RV project on the premises. What's going on there?
Wayne said:I am one who has had my house insurance pulled for building a RV in my garage.
Wayne
C-GOYA
RV 7a
Wayne said:Just think if my house would have burned down and then they found about the plane - I think they could have denied the claim.
Wayne
C-GOYA
RV 7a
Here in the U.S. the claim likely would be denied.
I meant a claim for the plane as part of the loss. The main reason I posted was so that others would consider the fact that there project most likely is not covered in any way by there home owners insurance.tomcostanza said:The claim for the plane, or the claim for the house?
The exclusions written into a HO policy are generally intended to exclude coverage on aircraft or related parts, not coverage on the house because there is an airplane in the garage. As mentioned, some companies will allow you to schedule (specifically insure) the aircraft/kit as a part of your HO policy at an additional cost. For those that don't, consider seperate coverage.rvbuilder2002 said:I didn't even consider that he meant the claim for the loss of the house may have been denied just because the airplane project was there, but after rereading it I see that is probably what he meant.
I can't imagine they could get away with that, particularly if it could not be proven that the airplane in some way caused the loss to occure.