So I thought that the only difference between the 430 and the 530 was the screen size. However, I think I found something today that really makes the 530 better... distance to a VOR.
Let me make a short story a bit longer: The other day I was flying safety pilot in a RV7 with a 430W on the ILS 13 into HUT (http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0903/00200I13.PDF) arcing via the 240R IAF. We were using the GPS to follow the arc, and I wanted to back-up that we were indeed at 16 DME. However, the SL-30 for nav2 doesn't display DME and the GPS was tied up flying the approach, so selecting direct to HUT on the 496 (VFR only) was the only option to get a distance. Not wanting to debate the DME vs GPS distance thing here. Sure the 496 distance to HUT worked, but it's not IFR legal.
Now, today I was flying behind a 530 (with a 430 as nav2) and with the added real-estate of a larger screen, there's an additional box in the lower left corner that displays the VOR identifier, radial, and distance that is set in the nav part of the 530. Now please tell me if I'm wrong, but I think this is the info I was looking for on the arc, right? With the 530 I can be using the GPS to fly the intermediate segment of the approach, and with HUT in the nav part of the 530, it'll show me distance. And since it's all on an IFR unit, it's legal to use, right?
I hope this makes sense. Just looking for confirmation of my idea and to point out a difference between the 430 and 530 that wasn't readily apparent to me.
Thanks for your time.
-Jim
Let me make a short story a bit longer: The other day I was flying safety pilot in a RV7 with a 430W on the ILS 13 into HUT (http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0903/00200I13.PDF) arcing via the 240R IAF. We were using the GPS to follow the arc, and I wanted to back-up that we were indeed at 16 DME. However, the SL-30 for nav2 doesn't display DME and the GPS was tied up flying the approach, so selecting direct to HUT on the 496 (VFR only) was the only option to get a distance. Not wanting to debate the DME vs GPS distance thing here. Sure the 496 distance to HUT worked, but it's not IFR legal.
Now, today I was flying behind a 530 (with a 430 as nav2) and with the added real-estate of a larger screen, there's an additional box in the lower left corner that displays the VOR identifier, radial, and distance that is set in the nav part of the 530. Now please tell me if I'm wrong, but I think this is the info I was looking for on the arc, right? With the 530 I can be using the GPS to fly the intermediate segment of the approach, and with HUT in the nav part of the 530, it'll show me distance. And since it's all on an IFR unit, it's legal to use, right?
I hope this makes sense. Just looking for confirmation of my idea and to point out a difference between the 430 and 530 that wasn't readily apparent to me.
Thanks for your time.
-Jim