I have a question about the fuel tank attach brackets. There is a bracket on the fuel tank that gets bolted to a bracket on the fuselage (DWG 38). The fuselage bracket gets a slot extending out from the bolt hole to the edge of the bracket... I believe this is so that in the event of an impact the fuel tank can tear away backwards away from the fuselage.
What I don't understand is why the corresponding hole on the fuel-tank bracket is specified to have a minimum 1/2" edge-distance. With the slot in the fuselage bracket, under a sufficient shear load the bolt would rip through the slot to the edge of the fuselage bracket long before it would rip through the (non-slotted) tank bracket. It seems strange that they would deliberately design a weakeness into one bracket but then insist on a very generous edge-distance on the second bracket that it gets bolted to.
Any ideas?
What I don't understand is why the corresponding hole on the fuel-tank bracket is specified to have a minimum 1/2" edge-distance. With the slot in the fuselage bracket, under a sufficient shear load the bolt would rip through the slot to the edge of the fuselage bracket long before it would rip through the (non-slotted) tank bracket. It seems strange that they would deliberately design a weakeness into one bracket but then insist on a very generous edge-distance on the second bracket that it gets bolted to.
Any ideas?