I play Dan on TV
Do it if you want to. I'm glad I did! That's all I can tell you. You gotta make the decision for yourself.
If you've never flown a stick-equipped airplane, I'd probably recommend just going with the standard setup. But if you're like me, and have ingrained the physical pattern of stick-in-right, throttle-in-left, then you have a decision to make.
The ONLY complaint I have is that when my knees are bent and feet on the floor all the way back to the spar, my left knee rests against the friction lock knob bolt. If I straighten my legs (which is more comfortable anyway) it's no factor.
Next time I will almost definitely make my own quadrant. Just wasn't up for doing that the first time around.
I don't have right side brakes (I kept my plane light...1113 pounds), and it does NOT bother me that the right seater can't operate the throttle. I don't really care about that. I have enough ratings that I won't be taking a checkride, and anybody flying from the right seat isn't gonna be taking off or landing my plane, so I'll work the throttle for 'em in the unlikely event that we need to change power settings.
PROS (for me):
1) I used the AFP injection system, and with horizontal induction, the throttle cable being on the far left already HELPED that installation. Same with the prop cable. Much more straightforward routing. Note, this is only for horizontal induction...for vertical it wouldn't have mattered.
For a carb'd setup, you'd probably just need to route the cable over to the center before punching through the firewall. Not a big deal imho.
2) It's where I want it. Period. Stick-in-right, throttle-in-left. It's what works BEST for ME (and probably just about every RV-3 or RV-4 or RV-8 or stick-equipped military plane out there...hm...). I can't speak for anybody else. Your comfort does matter. Intuitive placement and comfortable coordination translates into BETTER control in all phases of flight. If your brain has to compensate, something else will suffer.
3) Formation. I personally believe that a quadrant is ideal for formation flying. Whether it's on the left or right doesn't really matter. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the standard black knob in the center, but I believe having a lever to move is a more intuitive and more easily coordinated physical motion. This is, of course, VERY subjective.
4) The ability to adjust multiple power controls simultaneously. With the standard "center 3," you might be able to move two controls at the same time, but I doubt it (other than maybe mashing them full forward). With a quadrant, you can. Value? Not much, but hey, I consider it a pro.
CONS: (for me)
1) The obvious one, which is extra time. Any time you stray from the plans, it will add build time. But seriously, looking back on the 2060 or so hours it took to build my plane, it was worth every minute. If it had been 2075 or 2106 hours or whatever, it STILL would be worth it. Adding build time for the sake of customization is a
good thing!
2) The knee thing I mentioned. This is easily overcome by "ergonomic engineering." If you do go with a left side quadrant, I recommend having your seat cushions to play with first. I didn't have my seat cushions, and I had to take guesses as to my seated position. My guesses ended up working out, with the exception of that one rare position, when my knees are bent (heels at the spar).
I have no regrets about using the left-handed quadrant. It's my plane, customized for me. Make yours customized for you.
)_( Dan
RV-7 N714D
http://www.rvproject.com