+1If I was you I’d at least closely scrutinize every single element of that fuel system. I’d prob take the entire fuel system out and start from scratch.
There is a VERY good chance that bits of teflon tape can get into the fuel system and stop it up.Forgive my ignorance, but what's wrong with Teflon tape on fuel fittings?
Honestly? While I am a big believer that any line which isn’t subjected to flexing (crossing an airframe/engine interface) should be a solid line because they last the same amount of time as the airframe (that is, they are permanent), I have heard nothing but awful language from folks trying to install the lines around gear legs on tricycle gear RV’s….and will allow that flex lines DO have their place sometimes. Yes, you can continue to learn and make a good line for that spot - or call Tom Swearengen at TS Flightlines for a flex line. I’d probably beat my head against the first option for a few tries (and some scrap), but might end up with one of Tom’s lines…..Thanks, Paul.
Sounds like I've got lots of work to do.
Any suggestions about getting the bend around behind the landing gear mount? I can't see how to do it any other way than by hand and hoping the tube doesn't collapse in the process.
Yes.This plane is ten years old and has 200 hours on it. You think the risk still exists?
Complete loss of power from blockage of the fuel system is definitely on the table.What happens when the teflon stops up the fuel system? Does the engine just quit, or does something else happen?
Glad it isn’t an airplane-wide problem! I confess I am not qualified to comment on the proper fix. My assumption is that the teflon has to come out, but I have to let someone wiser tackle the whether & how.Thanks for that explanation. I inspected all fuel lines forward and aft of the firewall and found that the only place Teflon tape has been applied is at the fuel selector. Fortunately, the first component downstream of the fuel selector is the fuel filter, which has a much larger surface area than any stray segment of Teflon tape. I think for now what I'll do is leave the Teflon in-place, so I don't further contaminate the fuel system by the process of extracting the Teflon taped fittings. I'll pull the fuel filter and inspect it (clean it if necessary) then re-install the fuel filter and keep rolling. Do you think there's any risk in proceeding with this plan?
Here is one sad and notorious example with two fatalities that was caused by the builder who used the incorrect sealant in the fuel system:That's a neat little trick with the earplugs. Thanks for sharing it. Would you mind pointing me to the examples you referenced about RV stories that ended sadly due to fuel system issues? I love learning from the mistakes of others whenever possible.
Unfortunately the builder deviated from the plans and did not follow good practice when sealing NPT fittings i.e. Loctite 565 or 567 paste (or fuel lube per Van's construction manual section 5). RTV and teflon tape can both cause blockages and in another recent example of a forced landing that was reported on VAF a loose particle of fuel tank sealant blocked the fuel flow sensor because it had been installed in the incorrect location, by the builder, against the recommendations of the manufacturer. These are just a couple of examples and there are certainly many more!The concern expressed in this thread so far has been the use of Teflon tape. This report indicates that the builder used RTV to seal fuel lines. Although this report is informative, the build plans I have do not state that the use of RTV is appropriate for sealing fuel lines. Section 8 of the Construction Manual says to "Use Fuel Lube (a sealing paste available in supply catalogs) when installing AN fittings with pipe threads. Do not use Teflon tape!" A search of Aircraft Spruce for the term "fuel lube" yielded the following product: https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/cspages/ezturnlube.php?clickkey=9406 which is not RTV or Teflon tape.
Although I feel for the loss of this family, a cursory review of this information reveals that the builder deviated from the build plans and that this lawsuit is therefore frivolous. Yes, the loss of life is tragic, but the builder bears full responsibility here, IMO.