VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 08-11-2006, 10:58 AM
Don's Avatar
Don Don is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 696
Default 12/14v vs 24/28v systems

While attending Oshkosh I heard Greg Richter (sp? - the Blue Mountain guy) give a talk on aircraft wiring for smart people. He made a strong case for using a 28v system. His argument is most electronics (radios and efis's...efii?) work on either and will stop working at 9.6v more or less. If you lose your alternator he argues that you'll have a lot longer use of your electrical system as your battery drops from 24v to 9.6v than you would if you had a 12v system. Actually he thinks 48v is ideal but 24v is the best you can readily do now. He also argues that you can save 6-10 lbs of wire using 24v and the lighter guage wire required.

I'm midway along with the fuselage and nearing a point where I need to finalize my wiring plans but early enough that I can change plans without any real impact (other than maybe a little money). I've got a set of Whelen position lights and strobes that are 12v that's my only real 12v electrical investment so far and I'm sure I could sell them for near what I have in them if I go 24v. But as I look around, the light weight alternators seems to be 12v (though I'm sure if l look harder I can find a 24v). The LED lights I've been thinking of switching to for weight and other reasons are strictly 12v. So right out of the gate I seem to be heading uphill. I believe my planned radios and purchased EFIS (a dual GRT Series 1) can operate on either.

So, this not is too long but my questions are:

1. Am I right that 12v systems are predominant today? This includes the assumption that putting together a 24v system will involve more scrounging and searching.

2. Is there a simple way to get a 12v system to last longer in the event of a battery failure other than adding a second battery?

3. Other than night flying, I don't really see an electrical failure as a big issue. About the biggest concern would be loss of the GPS and I expect I'd have a handheld that would suffice for getting me to an alternate airport. If all else fails there's always the chart and pilotage to get me to an airport. Does anyone see something I'm missing?

My inclination at this point is to resign myself to the 12v system and finish the airplane. In theory, Greg appears right. In practice, he may be right in the future. For now theory and practice don't seem to agree.

Don
__________________
Don Alexander
Virginia
RV-9A 257SW Purchase Flying - O-320, Dynon D100
RV-9A 702DA (reserved) Finish Kit IOX-340
www.propjock.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2006, 11:11 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

Go with 12 volts! 6-10 lbs saved on wiring? I doubt it very much. Weight of 12v vs. 24v battery? Expense of 24v alternator system? Expense of 12v vs 24v accessories? Most amateur-built aircraft take advantage of many 12v automotive parts. 24v parts are almost exclusively aircraft. Compared the price difference?
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2006, 11:30 AM
joeboisselle joeboisselle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: White Swan Wa.
Posts: 366
Thumbs up

I agree with Mel, go 12 volt. Your brand new aircraft with all new parts shouldn't be having any electrical problems any time soon. And if you do have problems...at night, how long will a 25 ah battery last you while running minimal equipment for minimal amounts of time? I doubt you'd have enough gas to run it all the way down. Good question tho!
__________________
Joe Boisselle
2010 RV-4
1941 Luscombe 8C
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2006, 12:17 PM
Paul Eastham's Avatar
Paul Eastham Paul Eastham is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 506
Default

Bob Nuckolls dismantles this and a few other dubious statements from this guy at:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles...response_1.pdf
__________________
Paul Eastham - Mountain View CA
RV-9A standard build, flying! ~300 hrs
EAA Chapter 338 San Jose
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2006, 12:29 PM
PJSeipel PJSeipel is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, GA for the moment
Posts: 294
Default

I am going with a 28V system. I expect some will try to talk me out of it or tell me I'm stupid, but they're wasting their breath.

That said, yes, you will have a harder time finding some things in 28V. Most things can be found in both voltages, but if you plan on using automotive parts, go 12V.

I doubt the wire savings will really be 6-10 lbs. I know mine won't because I wired fairly conservatively. If you bought the Whelen System 6 that Van's sells, then it works on 28V, just need to swap the bulbs on the position lights. Plane-power makes a 70 amp alternator that does 28V and costs the same as their 14V model.

If you go 28V you are bucking the current trend and you will find yourself scratching your head over some items (landing lights, trim system, flap motor). All of these can be solved, it just depends on whether it's worth it for your situation and mission profile.

PJ
RV-10 #40032
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2006, 12:38 PM
PJSeipel PJSeipel is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, GA for the moment
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Eastham
Bob Nuckolls dismantles this and a few other dubious statements from this guy at:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles...response_1.pdf
I don't disagree with much of what Bob wrote, but Bob's response was written to a draft that Greg later revised, and Greg did fix a lot of the areas Bob had an issue with. There's a big difference between what Greg talked to at OSH and the document Bob tore apart.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-2006, 07:05 PM
w1curtis's Avatar
w1curtis w1curtis is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eastern, PA
Posts: 828
Default

You have to understand where Greg is coming from. That 6-10 pounds may be accurate on the composite plane that he is use to (Cozy Mk 4) but in our metal planes we can use the airframe as ground and effectively cut our wiring in half compared to his composite. While his thinking is technically correct, in the practical world of single engine airplanes, a 12/14 volt system beats out the technical superiority of 28 volts.

Side note; the composite Cirrus uses 28 volts but the Columbia uses 12/14. A couple of years ago the auto industry tried to move to 36/42 volts. But like the metic system, technical superiority lost out to day-to-day practically.
__________________
William Curtis
SB RV-10 40237, Status, Panel, Engine, Paint, Me, NE RV-10 Page, Cessna 177RG, AF Missions
?Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.? - Dr. Suess
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-2006, 07:14 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

One other small thing that has happened to me. Ever been stranded at a small airport needing a "starter boost" and the airport doesn't have a 24v booster. Just about any car in the parking lot can give a 12v boost.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-2006, 07:38 PM
Kyle Boatright Kyle Boatright is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
Default

Automobiles use a 12v system. That means that there are many suppliers of instruments and other components that will work on 12v. The economies of scale mean that 24v stuff will be more expensive for equivalent products. The battery many (most?) of us are using these days costs about $70 on Ebay. I don't think you'll find a similar deal on a 24v battery.

In addition with 12v, you can easily find a battery tender or a battery charger that will work on your system. Shoot, you can jump the battery in your airplane from your car or from an automotive jump starter.

Finally, there are plenty of accessories (cell phones, CD players, etc.) you can run off of a 12v power plug installed in your panel. Not sure if you can do that with a 24v system.

24v is superior in theory (more power, less weight, etc.), but the practicalities all point you to 12v.
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2006, 09:16 AM
Don's Avatar
Don Don is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 696
Default 12v vs 24v discussion

Thanks guys. This was exactly the discussion I wanted to get when I posted. I'm going to proceed ahead with a 12/14v system but I'm doing it knowingly. If there was an emoticon with a smile and a morter board it would be perfect for me - an education without having to go to the school of hard knocks.

Don
__________________
Don Alexander
Virginia
RV-9A 257SW Purchase Flying - O-320, Dynon D100
RV-9A 702DA (reserved) Finish Kit IOX-340
www.propjock.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.