A lot can be written on this subject.. "Performance"-wise, at least what we consider it to be -- yes any of those would work just fine.
I agree with you that this requirement is putting additional burden and increasing overall cost (by at least a grand, if not a little more), but it is what it is. It's important to understand that this has nothing to do with "IFR" so you being VFR doesn't change the reasoning why they require a "certified" one.
Further more, it's not really a requirement that the GPS is certified as standalone.. it can be certified as part of the box (ie NavWorx selling you a box that includes an internal GPS that's approved as source position *for that box*)...
As I said I agree this is not really helping in keeping flying affordable for those who want to participate and fly in airspace that will eventually require ADS-B compliance. Note: participation is not mandatory -- just stay out of the airspace that requires it and you're good..
