|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

08-08-2006, 02:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
GNS430 vs. GNS480
Based on advertized capability I was ready to go with the GNS480 but a friend with a GNS430 said the Garmin originated 430 is much more intuitive to use that the Apollo originated 480. What is your experience?
Bob Axsom
|

08-08-2006, 03:03 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,166
|
|
You can download PC simulators for both models from the Garmin site and check them out yourself. The links are in the upper right corner for each product:
http://www.garmin.com/products/gns480/
http://www.garmin.com/products/gns430/
The user guides are also online. It'll take an hour or so to learn and check them out, but it's a big $$ purchase. It's worth spending the time. After I did that exercise, I found the 430 easier to use. However, I believe the 480 has some higher level flight management capabilities. I'm sure somebody can elaborate further on that.
|

08-08-2006, 03:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 17
|
|
Bob,
Check this link and explore Tom Roger's Avionics West web site. He has insightful articles that may answer you questions.
http://www.avionicswest.com/myviewpo...alive.htm#1115
I hope to see you again at next year's Cup Race.
Robert Saltsman, Race 19
|

08-08-2006, 04:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
Thanks Guys
Good information from the Forum as usual.
Robert, if they can pull it together agan for 2007 (it always seems to be a struggle) it will be fun to fly the cup race again. You have to be very proud of your performance in that bunch of tough but good competitors.
Bob Axsom
Race #71
|

08-08-2006, 06:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
|
|
480 fan but...
I've always really liked the 480 (even before it was Garmin  ). It also gives you WAAS right now (though 430/530 WAAS support seems right there).
As for easier vs. harder. I really think it is what you get used to. For example, I really like the way a KLN94 will delete a duplicate waypoint when you insert a STAR on the fly and it always throws me for a loop when I switch back to 430/530 and it doesn't. On the other hand, I like the way Garmin handles holds...
My one concern about buying a new 480 is its status as a purchased, mature, product dwarfed by an expanding family. If you know a 430, you can work a 530, all the nav features on a G1000, etc. With that in mind, I wouldn't look for much in the way of new features or anything beyond minor maintanence firmware support.
Good Luck!
-jjf
|

08-08-2006, 06:46 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 726
|
|
Once the "W" series Garmins come out, do we really think the 480 has much life left in it? I guess there are a few little features that it does, like displaying an HSI on it's screen, but with the advent of EFIS systems, especially when/if they support TSO-146 (will require a WAAS GPS and TSO-146a support), I wonder if the 480 won't be relegated to "maintainence mode" and all the focus put on the "W" series.
Truth be known that already has happened. The only "feature" that I know of for the 480, since it's TSO-146a certification, was really a bug fix. Remember, it can't support all the WAAS GPS approaches without more memory and the appropriate code changes.
Makes one wonder what Garmin really bought UPS AT for?
|

08-08-2006, 08:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, TX (ADS)
Posts: 2,180
|
|
IFR or VFR?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bob Axsom
Based on advertized capability I was ready to go with the GNS480 but a friend with a GNS430 said the Garmin originated 430 is much more intuitive to use that the Apollo originated 480. What is your experience?
Bob Axsom
|
I've heard that the 480 is better for heavy IFR users. IIRC, when you put in a waypoint (an intersection, for example), it automatically prompts you for one of the V airways from that point. Thus, it may allow for quicker IFR work.
The 480 also has the SL30's NAV/COMM section, meaning that it can monitor the standby frequency, track two VORs, etc.
430 is much cheaper than 480, but I no idea what the street price will be for the 430 with WAAS.
__________________
Doug "The Other Doug Reeves" Reeves
CTSW N621CT - SOLD but not forgotten
Home Bases LBX, BZN
|

08-09-2006, 12:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
|
|
The 480 does understand Victor airways, which can be nice for entering a clearance (as opposed to looking at the chart and finding the waypoints at each bend). It is really nice hooked to an MX-20 in IFR chart mode.
But I don't think it is a huge factor for IFR. In busy space like SoCal, I typically just enter the first few fixes and the final destination anyway since the clearance frequently changes. Then, once I am on my way, I fill in the rest of the clearance a bit at a time (don't forget to fly first!  )
-jjf
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 PM.
|