VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
w/a Donation






VAF on Twitter:
@VansAirForceNet

  #1  
Old 03-01-2013, 11:36 AM
Cfrisella's Avatar
Cfrisella Cfrisella is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sun city, Ca.
Posts: 255
Default Oil cooling Full Circle

I thought I'd share my experiences encounter while going through the process of relocating my oil cooler. Hopefully this will be usefull to others either thinking of doing it, or for those who actually need to.
Some basic information first. I completed my 7A in November of 2011. It has an XIO-360 set up with Van's standard 7 row oil cooler. At the time of completion the cooler was mounted in the stardard location behind number 4. My cyclinder temps have always been fine and the original oil temps were about 185. One thing to take into consideration is that early flights were done in the California winter, so temps were probably around 55 or so. In May of 2012 I decided to move my oil cooler to the left side of the lower cowl to test a 4 inch NACA scoop. Here's some pics of the install.







The incoming air flow originally just dumped into the engine compartment. When I tested this setup it was now summer time and OATs were probably around 75 to 85. Cyclinder temps continued to remain fine. A little higher I think, but my oil temps would slowly climb to the 220s when ran WOT for say 5 minutes. Being that it was now summer, with higher temps, I wasn't too sure if the higher oil temps were due to that, or if the intake air was restricted because it dumped into the engine compartment. This could be the cause of slightly higher cycinder temps as well. Too much air in, not enough getting out.
So I then decide to try and channel the oil cooler exhaust in a way that would isolate it from the engine compartment. I also wanted to perform the first tests under the same winter temps in hope of achieving my original oil temps around 180.
Here's what I came up with. I made a fiberglass duct that would seal around the exit side of the oil cooler and the fire wall forming air path down to the lower cowl. From there, a 3 inch silicone hose with a 45 degree bend would channel the exit flow into an airbox and finally out through a lower cowl vent.



Sorry it's not rotated.

One thing I want to add. Right before starting the rechanneling mods in December I flew it WOT in cold temps and the oil temps still slowly climbed to the 220s.
This morning I made the first test flight with all cooler exhaust air exiting a lower cowl vent. OAT was about 53F and oil temps never saw anything above 180 and I was pushing it. For the moment things look really good but I'll keep you posted as more time is flown off.
__________________
Cheers,
Chris Frisella
Www.boneheadcomposites.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2013, 12:34 PM
DennisRhodes DennisRhodes is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Taylorsville, Ga
Posts: 960
Default OIl Cooler results

That really should get great air flow thru the cooler. Just curious if you 're using some additional data points for getting oil Temp in and oil temp out of the cooler without the effects of the vernatherm or bypass devise in the accessory case? I would think that arrangement would get maximum cooling effects with the possibility of having to close off the air side to get the temp up to set point.
__________________
DRRhodes
2022 VAF Supporter
RV9 N908DR
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2013, 01:12 PM
Cfrisella's Avatar
Cfrisella Cfrisella is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sun city, Ca.
Posts: 255
Default

Unfortunately I'm not the type of person who likes to get crazy with data, if I don't have too. I'm usually happy with "yes" it does work, or "no" it doesn't. I think in extreme cold areas this setup may in fact need to be controlled. I'm just going to insert a large wiffle ball in the NACA if need be. My flying probably won't ever require that though.
__________________
Cheers,
Chris Frisella
Www.boneheadcomposites.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2013, 01:18 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 11,362
Default

Pressure differential drives the cooling mass through the system. Perhaps you might quantify the system, starting with the inlet and working your way through to the exit in a logical manner. Does the side inlet equal or exceed the pressure of the standard upper plenum source, as measured at the oil cooler face? If not, the place to start is the inlet shape and/or location.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2013, 04:01 PM
DennisRhodes DennisRhodes is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Taylorsville, Ga
Posts: 960
Default OIl Cooler

Heat exchangers can be difficult to troubleshoot. They have a lot of "hidden variables". But for sure the temp differential X mass flow in from the air side has got to equal the mass flow of the oil x temp differential out. Can't fool mother nature. Relocating can sure change the variables.
__________________
DRRhodes
2022 VAF Supporter
RV9 N908DR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2013, 04:22 PM
N427EF N427EF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,728
Default From recent experience

I am no expert in oil cooling set ups but like you, I can see when it works and when it does not.
A hangar neigbor with a tighly cowled Glassair II decided to reroute a perfectly good oil cooler set up. The set up was taking plenum air behind Cyl4 and dumping hot air out the side of the cowl via a 4"x4" set of louvers, never had trouble keeping the oil temps under control in his 200 hp IO-360.
At 400 hours Cyl 4 developed a crack and the oil cooler set up, robbing air, was blamed.
A NACA was installed much like yours in place of the louvers and air dumped out the bottom. This set up has overheated his oil temps on every subsequent flight and finally has been reinstalled the way it worked before.
My guess is that pressure on the side of the cowl is lower than pressure on the bottom of the cowl and maybe even lower than inside the cowl.
I suppose you could measure the pressures as Dan pointed out and find if you even have a pressure differential or perhaps a negative flow backwards.
Either way having oil temps climb to 220 F seems a lot like an oil cooler that does not cool at all. Hope you find a good solution.
__________________
Ernst Freitag
RV-8 finished (sold)
RV-10 IO-540 8.5:1
Running on 91 Octane E10 mogas since 2011
The older I get, the better I used to be.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2013, 07:40 PM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 790
Default

Chris NACA inlets are not good for pressure recovery. I think you have found that the pressure in your cowl is lower near the outlet. As Dan posted delta P is what drives cooler efficiency. You may also have lowered the pressure a bit with the outlet duct you installed to direct the air. Can't know for sure without a diff pressure measurement. You could try removing the hose and seeing what results you get, just for fun.
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
formerly IO-360A3B6D, Dual SDS CPI now, WW 200RV
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2013, 07:44 PM
Cfrisella's Avatar
Cfrisella Cfrisella is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sun city, Ca.
Posts: 255
Default Confused?

I think there's some confusion. The oil temps climbed to 220 when I just had the NACA dumping into the engine compartment. The most recent mod was channeling this air out the bottom of the cowl. From my first test flight today it appears that this modification has returned the oil temps back what they were when the cooler was mounted behind number 4.
__________________
Cheers,
Chris Frisella
Www.boneheadcomposites.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2013, 06:05 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

My experiments with NACA inlet at the lower cowl helped improve overall cooling but not for reason I expected.

At one point the inlets were duct taped shut to test their effect on cooling. Not much change noted. But what was noted was one inlet had no tape, it had been blown off by internal pressure.

I believe more air exits than enters with NACA cowl vents.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-02-2013, 06:52 AM
pa38112 pa38112 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clarksboro, NJ
Posts: 1,077
Default

I also have a NASA duct feeding my oil cooler in the same basic location. Mine dumps into the engine bay. I have taken lots of delta P readings with this set-up, and will post that information and photos when I have a little more time. - I am seeing 220 in the summer, and 165 in the winter. My plan was to duct the oil cooler exhaust out the bottom, but my delta P data suggested that it may not help. of course, the delta P in that location will change once the oil cooler exhaust is no longer compeating with the ram air. - I usually see 290 on the cylinder heads. - By the way, this is with an O-360, FP and a Sam James Cow.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.