VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2006, 10:23 PM
Bryan Wood's Avatar
Bryan Wood Bryan Wood is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Default Knot Wax

Has anybody tried this? Just wondering if the gains could be noticable on an RV.

http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav....5ac2&Dynamic=1

Regards,
__________________
Bryan 9A Sold
Beech S35, and daydreams of a Super 8 or a Rocket starting to take over my brain.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:10 AM
Kevin Horton's Avatar
Kevin Horton Kevin Horton is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
Default

A good wax job using any good quality wax might be beneficial. The CAFE Foundation did before and after speed tests on their Mooney, and found a wax job increased speed about 2.5 kts. They used ?Vision? Advanced Auto Polish manufactured by Turtle Wax.
__________________
Kevin Horton
RV-8
Moses Lake, WA, USA
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2006, 07:24 AM
Bob Axsom Bob Axsom is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
Default Dubious

The unit of measure in the table is MPH not kts and the surface response to terricloth described in the CAFE report is EXTREME. The note at the end of the article on the effect of surface polish as a source of error in precise performance measurement is interesting. Mind you I have never seen a boundary layer but I believe the low speed air immediately adjacent to the surface is there. If there is a difference in a test I would expect it has something to do with the boundary layer attachment rather than what you put on the surface. In the CAFE test flying two planes at the two times with identical recordings would be more meaningful. The second test specimen with no change between flights. I wax my plane and I have never seen any change in performance as a result. If I could pick up 2.5 kts or 2.5 mph with some surface treatment process I would be strongly inclined to do it. I believe you would not see that kind of difference on a well maintained airplane. I will wait and see.

Bob Axsom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2006, 10:31 AM
Kevin Horton's Avatar
Kevin Horton Kevin Horton is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Axsom
The unit of measure in the table is MPH not kts
The actual reported speed gain was 2.82 mph which is 2.45 knots. I rounded to 2.5 knots. No sense arguing over 0.05 knot

I expect the plane was in dire need of a wax job when the first test was flown.
__________________
Kevin Horton
RV-8
Moses Lake, WA, USA
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8/
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.