VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > Electrical Systems
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2013, 03:05 PM
humptybump humptybump is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,179
Default is grounding to the closest air frame a bad thing?

Most things ground to a grounding bus (which is easy for things in the panel). But what about the autopilot servos and a remote magnetometer or AHRS ?

It is "OK" or "a bad idea" to ground the servos direct to the airframe near the servo location ?

When a magnetometer is installed in the tail, It is "OK" or "a bad idea" to ground the unit to a near location on the airframe ?

Is this a vendor specific question ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2013, 03:37 PM
flyinga flyinga is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericksburg, TX
Posts: 662
Default

I grounede all of my "remote" electrical items (lights, servoes, etc.) at a convenient nearby airframe part. So far, no problems.
__________________
Jim Averett
RV-8
TS36 - Silver Wings
Fredericksburg, TX
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2013, 04:29 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is online now
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyinga View Post
I grounede all of my "remote" electrical items (lights, servoes, etc.) at a convenient nearby airframe part. So far, no problems.
Ditto.....
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2013, 07:35 PM
Mike D's Avatar
Mike D Mike D is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 456
Default

I ran all my grounds to a common terminal block because the GRT, auto pilot, flaps, and trim harnesses already had the long ground wires. I was already running the other wires. The radios required it in the install manual, so I did it.

But can't answer if grounding locally is a bad thing or not. It was just convent for me to not take that chance.
__________________
Michael Delpier
RV6A -O-320, fixed pitch, GRT Sport, 496
RV-10 - working on finish kit
Houston
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2013, 07:41 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

There are some technical reasons not to ground locally, like you might cause some corrosion where the parts are riveted or bolted together. Who knows if this is true or not.

The reason I put a forest of ground tabs on my firewall was to eliminate ground loops, and thus noise in my headset.

However, I did ground my position and landing lights on a plate nut riveted to the last (outboard) rib and I grounded the strobe pack right next to the strobe pack and brought the strobe wire shielding back to that same ground. That eliminated the noise in my headset from the strobe discharge.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2013, 04:12 AM
plehrke's Avatar
plehrke plehrke is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Defiance, MO
Posts: 1,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
However, I did ground my position and landing lights on a plate nut riveted to the last (outboard) rib and I grounded the strobe pack right next to the strobe pack and brought the strobe wire shielding back to that same ground. That eliminated the noise in my headset from the strobe discharge.
I did the same but added a grounding strap (short jumper wire) from the wing to the fuselage to ensure a good direct electrical path from the wings into fuselage. I know not needed but at day job that is standard practice. Makes sense when have large assemblies that are painted before final assembled since paint will not allow direct metal to metal and not assuming the fasteners will provide the grounding path.
__________________
Philip
RV-6A - 14+ years, 900+ hours
Based at 1H0 (Creve Coeur)
Paid dues yearly since 2007
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2013, 04:16 AM
GLPalinkas's Avatar
GLPalinkas GLPalinkas is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Venice, Fl
Posts: 1,020
Default

Using a ground wire for the fuel sensors is a good way to keep from having problems with those units. Most read errors are likely due to airframe grounding of the units.
__________________
Gary Palinkas - Gman.... VAF #161
Venice, Fl
RV-6 "Sassy" Flying 400 hrs since Oct 2011
Lycoming 0-360 A1A, FP Sensenich Prop
SARL #19 .... Van's Calendar March 2015
Although exempt several ways, =VAF= Dues paid to support this awesome site/family
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2013, 06:58 AM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

I'm a big fan of dedicated ground wiring and ground buses. It's a proven way of doing aircraft wiring that ensures good electrical grounds. I've wired up 4 different RVs that way.

However, my old Cherokee (new owner, still based at my airport) has been flying for nearly half a century with airframe grounds all over the plane including the battery under the back seat simply grounded to the airframe, and to this day has never had any grounding-related electrical issues.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-10-2013, 07:06 AM
humptybump humptybump is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,179
Default

Well, with the exception of the lights, which already have an airframe ground in the fuselage, everything else goes back to the ground bus.

Ive decided the servos will have "local ground". If it doesn't work out I'll run the extra ground wire. Lets just call this "my little experiment".

What I found interesting, when investigating this topic was that Dynon has said in forum posts that local ground to the airframe for the servos is OK. MGL said in an email that they want the servo ground to go back to panel. (I'm not using either vendor's servos. This was just a point of reference for my question.)

Last edited by humptybump : 02-10-2013 at 07:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-10-2013, 07:28 AM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
Default

My advice is to ground all avionics, intercoms, radio and "active" devices on a common ground buss like the forest of tabs up near the firewall. I also recommend that this be the point where the battery ground connects and the engine ground strap. Not saying that if you don't do this that you will have noise issues, it just helps make sure you don't

"Passive" devices are almost always OK to ground locally. (LED's without constant current drivers, regular incandescent lights, standard pitot tube heaters, etc)

MGL and Dynon both use stepper motors in their servos. Stepper motors can be huge noise sources since they typically operate with square waves on their motor leads and square waves are big noise generators. There are ways to limit the amount of noise that a square wave can produce by controlling the slew rate of the wave. Not sure if Dynon does this or not.

The biggie is to ensure that your audio system is grounded only where the manufacturer says to ground it especially the shields and the headset jacks!

Again not saying that if you don't do this that you will have noise issues, it just helps make sure you don't. The general idea should be to minimize ground loops where possible.
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Project Sold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.