VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2013, 10:35 AM
gmjeric gmjeric is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fairland Ok
Posts: 9
Default piston rings

has anybody used different rings such as those from total seal that have antifriction coatings.....overlaping designs.....or thinner profiles
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2013, 10:37 AM
gmjeric gmjeric is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fairland Ok
Posts: 9
Default

also has anybody used custom pistons with the ring pack and pin moved as high on the piston as possible
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2013, 11:04 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default Why??

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmjeric View Post
custom pistons with the ------- pin moved as high on the piston as possible
This will lower the compression....................
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2013, 12:25 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

I know the F-1 guys will use automotive gapless rings in the little O-200's, but they are also usually running plain steel barels, overbored to the limit of the rules. Once you start dealing with the big bore Lycoming cylinders, it is tough to even find "off the shelf" to fit. Add to that the requirements driven by chrome or nitrated cylinders, and it's even tougher to find compatable rings from the automotive world.

Not saying it cant be done, but I've not heard of such on a Lycoming. Perhaps someone else knows different?
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2013, 12:40 PM
rocketbob's Avatar
rocketbob rocketbob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
Default

I have a set of ECI 2nd rings I had TotalSeal modify to be gapless.

I have a friend running the same rings in an IO-360 on a Mustang 2 and last I talked to him his compressions were 80/80.
__________________

Please don't PM me! Email only!

Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.

Last edited by rocketbob : 01-25-2013 at 12:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2013, 09:13 PM
jrs14855 jrs14855 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 2,391
Default rings

In the 70's and 80's the total seal rings were quite popular in 0 360. No sure about compatability withm nitride cylinders but I know they are still available for Lycoming steel cylinders.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2013, 11:30 AM
gmjeric gmjeric is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fairland Ok
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S View Post
This will lower the compression....................
no we make up for it in rod length....when building from scratch get the smallest combustion chamber to leave plenty of quench..design piston as compact and flat as possible....then determine stroke and get the rod last....


the deeper the rings are on the piston and the wider the gap from piston to wall the less efficient you become...this all becomes dead volume that must be filled burned exhausted but doesnt burn in time to add push.....im still looking to encapsulate the spark plug but leave electrode bare so that maybe we could get two pads for quench area......ill dig it up but if you look at harley heads they are in the same boat...then go look at a eldelbrock harley head and you see the quench areas...then go look at a nitro prostock billet harley head and youll see the refinement im after
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-28-2013, 12:24 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmjeric View Post
also has anybody used custom pistons with the ring pack and pin moved as high on the piston as possible
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmjeric View Post
no we make up for it in rod length....when building from scratch get the smallest combustion chamber to leave plenty of quench..design piston as compact and flat as possible....then determine stroke and get the rod last....
My response was to your original post------nothing mentioned about rod length etc.

I stand by the comment that raising the pin height will lower compression, given the info in your original post. Your second post seems to be relating to a clean sheet design..........

What are you looking to accomplish with these design changes anyway???

Rod length is usually adjusted to accommodate stroke changes, or to lower piston skirt friction by lowering the rod angle----which is probably a negligible issue in our low RPM engines.

Your comment about needing to fill the volume above the rings is spot on, specially with our big bore engines.

A Dykes ring can actually be installed with virtually zero volume lost above the ring.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...TBNLlBxIu1PClQ

Dont forget cooling...................
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:43 AM
gmjeric gmjeric is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fairland Ok
Posts: 9
Default

Sorry i was making the assumption of gaining rod length to accommodate the piston pin change...

Im looking to maximize the efficiency of an o200...

as for the heat....add thermal coatings to ports, combustion chamber, valves and pistons.....keep the heat in the cylinder then keep it moving out the exhaust....also laying the valve seat from 45 to a 30 degree cut


with as low of a piston speed that we have im really concentrating on port velocities...we get about 3% increase from compression bump but when you match a cam profile to fit the compression increase your 3% can go to almost 10%

yes i could get all the power from an 320 or 360 but not fan of the extra weight....etc
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2013, 08:07 AM
rocketbob's Avatar
rocketbob rocketbob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmjeric View Post
exhaust....also laying the valve seat from 45 to a 30 degree cut
Why would you do that on the exhaust valve. Most engines have a 45 cut on both valves but a Lycoming or any aircraft engine for the matter is slow turning so it was found that there were better port numbers at low lift on the intake with a 30 degree cut.
__________________

Please don't PM me! Email only!

Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.