VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2013, 07:47 AM
Loman Loman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 179
Default Brake Reservoir Firewall Penetration

Apart from the paltry instructions and the poor quality of the reservoir itself, I am not happy with what I take to be the 'standard' method of connecting this thing to the brake feed lines.

It seems (though I can't find where it specifically says) that you are supposed to work out where the outlet bung needs to go through the firewall, drill a hole of some appropriate size and just poke it through. Could this be correct?

It seems in marked contrast to the care taken with other firewall penetrations, where we use expensive shields, eyeballs or specially designed bulkhead fittings, in addition to firewall sealant and lots of doublers.

I imagine the least that would be acceptable is to use firewall sealant around the reservoir outlet at the hole in the firewall. But, if this is acceptable in the vicinity of the 'little bomb' why is it not acceptable for all the other penetrations?

I understand that the mechanical loads are supposed to be taken by the reservoir mounting lugs, which are bolted directly to a strong point, but the strength of the mounting lugs themselves has been found sorely wanting in the past.

I found one builder (Roee Kalinsky take a bow) who felt it was unacceptable. He adapted an ACS reservoir with a proper mounting bracket, a T to split the feed on the engine side and two proper bulkhead fittings doing double duty as fixtures for the mounting bracket and separate fireproof bulkhead penetrations for each brake. That eliminates all of the problems with the reservoir (poor quality mount, interference with forward leaning firewall, poor female pipe threads, amateurish firewall penetration and a leaky nylon T piece. However all of that would take me a week, plus lead time on the parts.

Are there any other approaches that people would recommend or have actually implemented?
__________________
Loman O'Byrne
RV9 TU. O-320-E2D. Engine hung, working on FWF, Arklow, Ireland
=VAF= dues paid through Dec 2020
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2013, 08:08 AM
6 Gun 6 Gun is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 846
Cool mount

Over 8K of them flying and have not seen any problems.You could build light weight S.S. cover and incluled a S.S. hose clamp for support.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2013, 03:05 PM
Rupester Rupester is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mahomet, Illinois
Posts: 2,195
Default You raise a good point ...

... I too thought that was kinduv a "chintzy" arrangement - but I installed it that way and used the firewall sealant approach. it's working fine. hard to argue with the near-8000 of 'em flying.
__________________
Terry Ruprecht
RV-9A Tip-up; IO-320 D2A
S. James cowl/plenum
(Dues paid thru Nov '18)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2013, 03:49 PM
roee roee is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loman View Post
...

I found one builder (Roee Kalinsky take a bow) who felt it was unacceptable. He adapted an ACS reservoir with a proper mounting bracket, a T to split the feed on the engine side and two proper bulkhead fittings doing double duty as fixtures for the mounting bracket and separate fireproof bulkhead penetrations for each brake. That eliminates all of the problems with the reservoir (poor quality mount, interference with forward leaning firewall, poor female pipe threads, amateurish firewall penetration and a leaky nylon T piece. However all of that would take me a week, plus lead time on the parts.

...
Loman,

Thanks for the compliment!

Two minor correction to your comments:

1) The reservoir I used was from Grove, not ACS.

2) Just to clarify, the bulkhead fittings aren't the sole fixtures for the mounting bracket. The bracket is also riveted at the top to the firewall through the stiffener angle that runs horizontally across the back of the firewall. So the bracket is mounted to rigid structure, not just held to the thin sheet of the firewall by the bulkhead fittings.

Anyhow, it was all actually very easy to build. The only custom fabrication is the one angle bracket and one piece of tubing. You could easily do it in a couple of hours (lead time on parts aside). The hard part was coming up with the design. If you're happy with it, you're more than welcome to copy it. All the parts are listed at the bottom of the page.

Cheers,

-Roee

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6 Gun View Post
Over 8K of them flying and have not seen any problems.
On the contrary, I have heard numerous reports of the brackets fracturing over time on Van's stock reservoir. Which should be no surprise if you look at how it's designed.

And as to fire safety, admittedly I haven't heard of any reports where the brake reservoir penetration was specifically implicated in allowing fire and/or smoke to enter the cabin. Though partly I attribute that to the fact that engine fires are, thankfully, very rare. But also to the fact that many of the other firewall penetrations for push-pull cables, electrical wiring, etc., leave much to be desired if Van's standard methods are followed. With all that, the brake reservoir might not be the weakest link in a fire on a stock RV. Now, many of us have invested in better methods for fire-proofing our various firewall penetrations, the brake reservoir being just one of them. Consider that the integrity of the firewall is only as good as its weakest link. And so, if we're serious about the firewall's ability to do it's job as a firewall, then each and every penetration through it needs to be scrutinized.
__________________
Roee Kalinsky
San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
RV-7A under construction
www.kalinskyconsulting.com/rvproj/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2013, 03:51 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,477
Default

Can't speak specifics about the -9, but with an -8 it is very easy to relocate the reservoir to the corner of the front baggage compartment....no firewall penetration.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2013, 01:35 AM
roee roee is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanH View Post
Can't speak specifics about the -9, but with an -8 it is very easy to relocate the reservoir to the corner of the front baggage compartment....no firewall penetration.
With the -7/9, putting the reservoir on the cabin side of the firewall wouldn't be as practical, though I did consider it. The two main problems I saw with it were that there wouldn't be convenient access for servicing, and that there would be greater chance of brake fluid spillage in the cockpit.

With the -8, with its front baggage compartment, it sounds like a great solution.

The best firewall penetration is no firewall penetration. Can't argue with that!
__________________
Roee Kalinsky
San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
RV-7A under construction
www.kalinskyconsulting.com/rvproj/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2013, 04:49 AM
WingsOnWheels WingsOnWheels is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,088
Default

I changed my reservoir out to this version. Not because I had a problem with the Vans model, but I am using DOT4 fluid and this reservoir has a diaphram to prevent moisture getting in the system. Fits great in the stock location with good clearance to the engine mount.





__________________
Colin P.
RV-6A #20603
Complete 5/10/19
PP SEL / A&P
I donate every year on my B-Day (in Dec), but donated early in Sep'19.

Last edited by WingsOnWheels : 01-18-2013 at 04:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2013, 06:44 AM
Loman Loman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 179
Default Now THAT is aviation quality

Colin,

That's beautiful! Where did you source it?
__________________
Loman O'Byrne
RV9 TU. O-320-E2D. Engine hung, working on FWF, Arklow, Ireland
=VAF= dues paid through Dec 2020
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-18-2013, 06:50 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roee View Post
The best firewall penetration is no firewall penetration. Can't argue with that!
Agree - All of our RV's have master-cylinder-mounted individual brake reservoirs. This allows half the brake line plumbing, no firewall penetrations, easy bleeding (from the slave cylinders, with pressure), and almost no maintenance. Individual reservoirs have been used for decades on certified airplanes, and they are awfully simple.
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-18-2013, 07:08 AM
WingsOnWheels WingsOnWheels is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loman View Post
Colin,

That's beautiful! Where did you source it?
Or at least hot-rod quality:

http://www.scottshotrods.com/RemoteReservoir.asp

Machined from a single chunck of aluminum, so no welds to break. Only downside is that the mounting holes are 1/4" coarse thread, It rather they were 3/16.

I removed some material on the back (where you can't see it) to cut the weight a bit. If I had a lathe or end mill I could do quite a bit more.
__________________
Colin P.
RV-6A #20603
Complete 5/10/19
PP SEL / A&P
I donate every year on my B-Day (in Dec), but donated early in Sep'19.

Last edited by WingsOnWheels : 01-18-2013 at 07:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.