VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Fuel Injection Systems
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-04-2013, 12:02 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
Default

Depends on if you are interested in what the "ship" side of the fuel system is providing (GUMP check), or if you want to know the servo is scheduling fuel. An ailing/failing boost pump or main fuel pump will likely not show up if you are reading pressure at the divider. Not until it quits, anyway.

Generally speaking, "fuel pressure" is the pressure available TO the engine (servo/carb), not what happens after.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C

Last edited by Toobuilder : 01-04-2013 at 12:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-2013, 12:09 PM
Berchmans Berchmans is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 456
Default

Ok, so sometimes I'm a twit. After looking in the box the throttle body came in I found the gasket in a brown paper envelope taped in one end...in my defense the color is the same as the cardboard...well close anyway. Now on to fitting the cowling.
__________________
Burke Wick
Flying RV 8
Anchorage, Alaska
VAF Dues Paid for 2020
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2013, 07:59 AM
Don at Airflow Don at Airflow is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 316
Default Measuring nozzle pressure

Quote:
Originally Posted by penguin View Post
With due respect I disagree. The pressure indication at the servo provides much more information that at the pump. For example that fuel has reached the spider when priming, that fuel is flowing to the spider when the engine is running, and a zero indication means there is no fuel flowing to the injectors. Yes, the indicated pressure will vary with throttle opening. Reading pressure straight from the pump just says the pump is making pressure, doesn't say anything about the servo unit. I have both pressures measured, a sender in the spider should be rated to withstand engine vibration (or use a hose and a remote sender).

Pete
With all due respect for Mr. Penguin?s comment on monitoring the ?spider? (technically the flow divider) pressure. The pressure is a relationship to nozzle backpressure, so it really only measures what the nozzle backpressure is. If you know the size of the injector nozzles then you can establish the relationship between nozzle backpressure and fuel flow. The nozzle size must be held accurately +/- 0.25% on flow) for this to give meaningful data. If the nozzle restrictor sizes are changed for nozzle tuning purposes then this relationship is out the window and is pretty much meaningless. Also the nozzle backpressure curve is based on a fixed orifice size so follows the formula for incompressible fluids, which is a square curve. The result is a having fairly inaccurate readings at low flows as most pressure gauges are +/- 2% on flow.

As far as a troubleshooting device, measuring nozzle backpressure is only really good for determining if there is a clogged or partially clogged nozzle. If the gauge reads zero, why is the gauge reading zero? This in it self doesn?t tell you much. Maybe the flow divider is stuck closed, maybe the boost pump or engine driven pump is not working, maybe the mixture control is rigged wrong, or maybe there is no fuel. In a flight situation since the ?servo? (technically the fuel control. The RS model of Bendix fuel injection systems were actually servoed regulators, the RSA design as well as the FM Airflow system is a direct acting regulator. No servo valve in these designs.) will compensate for inlet fuel pressure, if there is a drop in inlet fuel pressure the nozzle pressure will stay constant until the inlet fuel pressure drops to a point where the fuel control regulator can no longer compensate and the engine will quit. I think monitoring inlet fuel pressure is far more important in this respect than monitoring nozzle backpressure. I may be wrong here, but probably 60% of the RV?s here running fuel injection monitor fuel flows electronically with a digital flow meter, which is far more accurate than the old pressure gauge measuring nozzle backpressure.


Don
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-06-2013, 03:07 AM
penguin penguin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,087
Default

Don,

Thanks for the education!

What I was trying to say (clearly not very well) is that if only one pressure is measured, the pressure in the flow divider gives potentially more information than the pump outlet pressure. I'm not suggesting it should be used to give a fuel flow indication. I have a flow meter.

I find the flow divider pressure is useful when priming (Precision system) to know when fuel is flowing to the injectors.

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-06-2013, 08:51 AM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
Default

Pete, I think Don just explained why monitoring nozzle pressure is not "better"... The fact that the fuel control/servo compensates for a fairly wide range of inlet pressure means that you could have a partially failed fuel pump, yet would never see it looking only at the nozzle pressure. Someone else can jump in here with the exact numbers, but I think the fuel control will operate with pressures from 15 PSI to over 45. So your "normal" 40 PSI system could degrade down to 15 and you would be none the wiser. I don't know about you, but an ailing fuel pump is more critical information to me than knowing my primer system is working.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C

Last edited by Toobuilder : 01-06-2013 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.