VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2006, 06:43 AM
dwilson dwilson is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 433
Default Engine mount interference 0-320 B2C

I am building a 9A. I purchased a Lycoming 0-320 B2C from Aerosport Power. I purchased the special mounting weldment for the non-conical mount from Vans's. I also purchased the Lord mounting pillows/hardware from Van's.

Yesterday I mounted the engine and discovered in interference problem at the top left mount. The bolt head is VERY close to the pushrod tube, and I am afraid that when the engine is run they will impact each other.

I have attached 3 photos to show you the problem.
Is there a fix for this? Different mounting hardware/pillows? A different engine?

Thanks,
Duane Wilson
91199



__________________
Duane Wilson

RV9A. Built, flew 1000 hours, Sold

RV10 Built, flying 330 hours so far.

Central Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2006, 02:23 PM
herve-RV7's Avatar
herve-RV7 herve-RV7 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 61
Default

Hi Duane,
I would be interrested to know how you have solved your problem, I 'm n the way to buy the same type of motor as you (O320 B2C).
Thanks in advance for your comments
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2006, 08:04 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

FYI - My O-290-D2 has the same mounts I did not use the Lord mounts for this reason.

Here is a picture of my mount:



One thing I keep hearing is the conical mounts don't move much so the clearance of this bolt is not an issue.

I will find out if that is true when I fire this thing up for the first time.

BTW, in the three months since I hung the engine, it has "settled" some.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2006, 05:49 AM
mahlon_r mahlon_r is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,024
Default

That is pretty much the way it is on all certified aircraft, using the conical mount setup, as well. I have never seen it be an issue. However, I think you should use a castle nut and cotter pin to secure it. Using a lock nut, you really aren't tightening up against anything solid as lock nut are designed to be used. You are really only snuging the nut to squeeze the rubber. That type of situation is normally better suited for a castle nut and cotter pin, in my book. If the mount had a spacer that went in between the rubber biscuits to tighten the biscuits against, making a solid assembly, then a lock nut would be more appropriate...I think. Is it common practice to use a lock nut here?
Good Luck,
Mahlon
"The opinions and information provided in this and all of my posts are hopefully helpful to you. Please use the information provided responsibly and at your own risk."
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.