Indeed we do cut our control arm notch a bit deeper than Van's does. And we changed the profile of the pin, as stated earlier, to give more edge to contact the control arm notch.
There is a LOT going on with the tailwheel. More than I can possibly type up here. I do recommend everyone getting a copy of our
tailwheel tech sheets I think we've got a bit of info in them for most common problems. And it's free for the asking with no strings attached whatsoever.
One problem that no one has mentioned yet is that the Van's fork has a longer arm between the vertical pivot and the tire axle than the Bell fork or our Screaming Eagle fork do. That makes the Van's fork put a lot more load on the control arm and the locking pin, thus wearing them out. Actually,
damaging them out might be a better description in many cases.
(The longer arm, and other geometry, of the Van's fork also make it steer harder and snag more obstacles, but that isn't really the topic we're discussing here.)
This will sound like a sales pitch, sorry for that, but I suspect that if there was a way to survey the folks who are using our fork
and our control arm, you'd find very few locking problems. Doug Bell's fork should be similar if used with a control arm with a deepened notch.
IMHO, hardening parts isn't necessary when the parts are designed optimally as a complete system. You can do it if you like, but it's just masking the problem.
http://www.flyboyaccessories.com/sto...index&cPath=66
__________________
Vince Frazier
www.f1aircraft.com
F1 Rocket and F4 Raider components
1-888-F1AIRCRAFT (1-888-312-4727)
www.flyboyaccessories.com
RV and Rocket Accessories, Tailwheels, Tools, & More
1-888-8FLYBOY (1-888-835-9269)
F4 Raider - under construction
F1-H Rocket "Crazy Horse" - sold
RV-4 "Chief Pontiac" - sold in 1994, purchased in 2018